DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INOCME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 1(3), CHENNAI vs. M. MAHADEVAN , CHENNAI

ITA 1825/CHNY/2024Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 May 2025AY 2014-15Bench: SHRI SS VISWANETHRA RAVI (Judicial Member), SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) had not fully appreciated the facts regarding the share valuation and the transactions involving the assessee's wife. The matter of long-term capital gains was remitted to the AO for re-adjudication.

What were the facts?

The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order deleting additions made on account of the assessee's residential status and income earned abroad. The appeals also concerned additions made towards Long Term Capital Gains on share transfers.

What were the issues?

The key issues were the determination of the assessee's residential status and the correct valuation of shares for calculating long-term capital gains, particularly concerning alleged colourable devices to avoid tax.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 56(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI

Before: SHRI SS VISWANETHRA RAVI & SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA

Hearing: 08.04.2025Pronounced: 30.05.2025

Heard together (3 matters)

ITA No.1824/Chny/2024
ITA No.1825/Chny/2024
ITA No.1826/Chny/2024

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

PER AMITABH SHUKLA, A.M :

The below mentioned appeals have been filed by the appellant Revenue for AY-2013-14, AY-2014-15 and 2019-20 contesting the order of Ld. First Appellate Authority indicated Column-E, herein below:- S. Appeal AYs Appellant CIT(A) Order Details Respondent No. Nos. A B C D E F ITA DIN &

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 56(2)

All 166 judgments and leading authorities on Section 56(2) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →