ST. JOSEPHS EDUCATIONAL TRUST,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-193), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that a vague penalty notice, failing to specify the exact charge or limb under Section 270A or 271AAB, is a jurisdictional defect and vitiates the penalty proceedings. Such defects cannot be cured by Section 292B of the Act.
What were the facts?
The appeals concern penalties levied under Section 270A and Section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act for assessment years 2018-19 to 2020-21. The assessees, educational trusts, challenged the penalty notices, arguing they were vague and did not specify the exact charge or limb under which the penalty was being imposed.
What were the issues?
Whether a penalty notice under Section 270A or 271AAB is valid if it fails to specify the exact charge or limb under which the penalty is being imposed? Can such a defect be cured under Section 292B?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(11)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Manjunatha Cotton & Ginning Factory2,590 citing359 ITR 565 · 2013 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. SSA’s Emerald Meadows791 citing73 Taxmann.com 241 · 2016 · HC
- Mr. Mohd. Farhan A. Shaikh v. ACIT672 citing434 ITR 1 · 2021 · HC
- CIT v. Kaushalya511 citing216 ITR 660 · 1995 · HC
- Mak Data Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT443 citing358 ITR 593 · 2013 · SC · Read judgment
- Babuji Jacob v. ITO74 citing430 ITR 259 · 2021 · HC
- Prem Brothers Infrastructure LLP v. NFAC32 citing142 Taxmann.com 38 · 2022 · HC
- Jaina Marketing & Associates v. DCIT14 citing162 Taxmann.com 439 · 2024 · HC · Read judgment
- Chandra Suresh Kothari v. DCIT10 citing135 Taxmann.com 275 · 2022
- Enrica Enterprises P. Ltd. v. DCIT10 citing163 Taxmann.com 105 · 2024
- (Mumbai-Trib) 2. Kishor Digambar Patil v. Income Tax Officer6 citing149 Taxmann.com 502 · 2023
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, 'बी' न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 'B' BENCH: CHENNAI श्री एबी टी. वर्की, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं श्री जगदीश, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI JAGADISH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.3293 & 3294/Chny/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष/Assessment Year: 2018-19 & 2020-21 St. Joseph's Educational Trust, 56-C, Old Mahabalipuram Road, Sholinganallur, Chennai-600 119. [PAN: AAMTS 3888 G] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) v.
The DCIT, Central Circle-1(3), Chennai. (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.3295 to 3297/Chny/2024 निर्धारणवर्ष/Assessment Year: 2018-19 to 2020-21 St. Joseph's Institute of Science & Technology Trust, 56-C, Old Mahabalipuram Road, Sholinganallur, Chennai-600 119. [PAN: AAHTS 9943 B] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) V.
The DCIT, Central Circle-1(3), Chennai. (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Appellant by : Mr. V. Balaji, CA & Mr. K.R. Vasudevan, Advocate by Virtual प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Respondent by : Ms. Anitha, Addl.CIT सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 04.04.2025 घोषणाकीतारीख / Date of Pronouncement : 06.06.2025 ITA Nos.3293 & 3294/Chny/2024 (AYs 2018-19 & 2020-21)
St. Joseph's Educational Tr
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 270A
- Kamleshkumar Somalal Bhatt, Himatnagar vs Income Tax Ofifcer, Ward 1, HimatnagarITA 2130/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Kkg Associates, Visakhapatnam vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2(1)…ITA 345/VIZ/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shamsunder Pritesh Malode, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-12(1), HyderabadITA 399/HYD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Rama Naidu Gutha, Anantapur vs ITO, Ward -1, AnantapurITA 1895/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026