LOGANATHAN SENTHILKUMARAN,CHENNAI vs. ADDITIONAL / JOINT/ DEPUTY/ASISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX / ITO, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) should have adjudicated the matter on merits, especially given the reopened assessment involving factual issues. The Tribunal set aside the orders and remitted the matter back to the CIT(A) for a decision on merits after affording an opportunity of hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in the gas agency business, filed a return for AY 2014-15. The assessment was reopened under Section 147, leading to an addition by the AO. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal ex-parte due to non-compliance by the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without adjudicating the merits of the case, and if the matter should be remanded for a decision on merits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI JAGADISH
आदेश / O R D E R
PER JAGADISH, A.M : Aforesaid appeal filed by the assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15 arises out of the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax, National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter “CIT(A)”] dated 14.12.2023.
When the appeal was taken up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee and accordingly, the hearing was proceeded with the able assistance of Ld. D.R.
The assessee is engaged in the business of gas agency under the name and style of M/s. His Grace Agency, a dealer of Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. The assessee had filed return of income on 01.10.2014 declaring a total income of Rs.1,42,870/-. The assessment was reopened u/s. 147 of the Act based on a discrepancy between the total purchases as per the sale order report issued by HPCL and the books of account maintained by the assessee.
Consequently, the A.O passed an order u/s. 147 of the Act making an addition of Rs.19,11,081/-. Aggrieved by the said addition, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), who passed the order ex-parte due to non-compliance with notices and dismissed the appeal without adjudicating the issues on merits.
The Ld. Departmental Representative (DR), relied on the orders of lower authorities and submitted that the orders were passed ex- parte as the assessee has been non compliance to the notices issued.
We have heard the submissions of the Ld. DR and perused the material available on record. On perusal of the order of the Ld. CIT(A), we find that the appeal was dismissed solely on the ground of non- compliance by the assessee, without dealing with the merits of the additions made by the AO. In our considered view, the Ld. CIT(A) ought to have adjudicated the matter on merits, especially in the context of a reopened assessment involving factual issues. In the interest of justice, we deem it fit to set aside the orders passed by the A.O and the Ld. CIT(A) and remit the matter back to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) to decide the appeal on merits. The Ld. CIT(A) shall pass a reasoned order after providing due opportunity of hearing to the assessee, in accordance with law. We also direct the assessee to co- operate with the proceedings and appear before the Ld. CIT(A) on the date of hearing without fail. In view of the above, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 26th day of June, 2025 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026