RANJANA BANSAL,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD 40(5), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1944/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 January 2021AY 2015-162 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal for the assessment year 2015-16. Subsequently, the assessee requested withdrawal of the appeal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA

For Appellant: Shri. Prayanshu Singhal, CA
For Respondent: Shri. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR
Hearing: 08.01.2021Pronounced: 08.01.2021

PER G.S. PANNU, VP : This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2015-16 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A), New Delhi dated 06.02.2019.

2.

The learned counsel for the assessee, vide its letter dated 01.01.2021, received through email, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to 2 ITA-1944/Del/2019 the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. 3. Learned Senior DR has no objection.

4.

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →