KEEZHKULAM PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED NO 3938,KANYAKUMARI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal is hearing the appeal preferred by the assessee. The specific grounds and decision are not detailed in the provided excerpt.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The appeal pertains to the assessment year 2021-22.
What were the issues?
The primary issue is the appeal filed by the assessee against the CIT(A)'s order for the assessment year 2021-22.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, B BENCH: CHENNΑΙ
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI JAGADISH
आदेश / O R D E R
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/Addl/JCIT(A), Faridabad, (hereinafter referred to as “the Ld.CIT(A)”), dated 27.01.2025 for the Assessment Year (hereinafter referred to as "AY”) 2021-22.
The main grievance of the assessee is against the action of the Ld.CIT(A) in not granting deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act”).
The brief facts brought to our notice are that the assessee is a Primary Agricultural Co-operative Credit Society and its Members are primarily agriculturists. Further it is noted that assessee is registered as a society under the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983; and its main source of income was from lending of loan to its members for purchase of seeds, fertilizers and other inputs for the farm. In the year under consideration, the assessee filed its return of income (RoI) after the due date specified u/s.139(1) of the Act. The due date in filing of return for AY 2021-22 was 15.03.2022, whereas the assessee has filed the return only on 13.10.2023, which according to the assessee was due to delay in receiving statutory audit from the State Audit Department, Tamil Nadu. For belated filing of RoI [i.e., not filing ITR within the due date prescribed u/s.139(1) of the Act], the assessee’s claim made in its ITR for deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act was denied by the CPC by intimation u/s.143(1) of the Act dated 13.12.2024.
Aggrieved by the action of the CPC denying deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld.CIT(A) and simultaneously filed application for condonation of delay in filing of RoI before the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (CCIT, Madurai) who by order dated 23.02.2024 [for AY 2021-22] was pleased to condone the delay in filing of the return. Despite there being an order of the competent authority condoning the delay in filing of return within the time prescribed u/s.139(1) of the Act, the Ld.CIT(A) is found to have erred in disallowing the claim of the assessee. Therefore, we set aside the impugned order of the Ld.CIT(A) and restore the appeal back to his file with a direction to pass order in the light of condonation order passed by the CCIT, Madurai dated 23.02.2024 for AY 2021-22 after hearing the assessee.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on the 04th day of July, 2025, in Chennai.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026