SHANKERLINGAM MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,CHENNAI vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 962/CHNY/2025Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 July 20253 pages
AI SummaryN/A

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal, invoking principles of natural justice, set aside the CIT(E)'s ex-parte order. It restored the application for registration back to the CIT(E)'s file, directing the CIT(E) to issue fresh notices and provide the assessee with an adequate opportunity to be heard before passing a speaking order.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a religious and charitable trust, applied for registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act via Form 10AB. The CIT(E) rejected the application through an ex-parte order in Form 10AD due to the assessee's non-compliance with notices. The assessee appealed, seeking another opportunity for hearing before the CIT(E).

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(E) erred in rejecting the registration application ex-parte without providing sufficient opportunity to the assessee, violating principles of natural justice.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AB,Section 12A(1)(ac)(ii)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, A BENCH, CHENNAI

Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K & SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA

Pronounced: 24.06.2025

आदेश /O R D E R

PER S. R. RAGHUNATHA, AM :

1.

This appeal by the assessee is filed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Chennai, vide order dated 11.03.2025.

2.

We find from the grounds that the assessee is a religious and charitable trust had filed an application seeking registration u/s.12AB of the Act, vide application in Form 10AB dated 29.09.2024 u/s.12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Act. The ld.CIT(E) has rejected the application for non-compliance of the assessee in further proceedings by passing an order in Form 10AD dated 11.03.2025. Hence, the assessee filed this appeal and prayed for one more opportunity of hearing before the Ld.CIT(E).

:-2-: ITA. No:962/Chny/2025 3. The ld.DR relied on the impugned order and submitted that the ld.CIT(E) had given sufficient opportunity and hence prayed for confirming the same.

4.

We have heard both the parties, perused the record and impugned orders. It is an undisputed fact on record that the notices were issued by the ld.CIT(E) on the e-filing/ITBA portal. It is a matter of admitted fact that the assessee had filed an application on 29.09.2024 u/s.12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Act, in Form No. 10AB seeking registration u/s.12AB before CIT(E), Chennai. However, the ld.CIT(E) passed the order in Form 10AD rejecting registration u/s.12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Act filed in Form 10AB due to non-compliance of the notices as per the impugned order dated 11.03.2025.

5.

In our considered view, since the Ld.CIT(E) rejected the application by passing an exparte order due to non-participation of the assessee and the assessee needs to be given one more opportunity in the interest of natural justice and fair play.

6.

Therefore, keeping in mind the principles of natural justice we set aside the order of ld.CIT(E) and restore the application filed u/s.12A(1)(ac)(ii) of the Act, in Form No. 10AB for seeking registration u/s.12AB of the Act, back to the file of the Ld.CIT(E) with a direction to send notices on the assessee afresh through registered email ID, e-portal or as per provisions of the Act and pass speaking order after giving adequate opportunity to the assessee as per law. Needless to say, the assessee should be diligent in responding to the notices and furnish all the required documents during the proceedings without seeking unnecessary adjournments and providing correct address and email ID. Thus, the matter is restored to the CIT(E), Chennai. In case the assessee fails to appear then, no lenient view will be taken by the ld.CIT(E).

:-3-: ITA. No:962/Chny/2025 7. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the court on 15th July, 2025 at Chennai.

More judgments on Section 12AB

All 5,972 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →