MUNIYAPPA NAGARAJU,KRISHNAGIRI vs. ITO, WARD-1,, HOSUR

There is a delay of 562 days in filing the appeal by the assessee. The assessee has filed condonation petition/affidavit stating the petition/affidavit of delay in filing the appeal and satisfied that there was sufficient cause for not filing the appeal within the prescribed time limit. Hence, the delay is hereby condoned.

At the outset, the Ld. Authorized Representative submitted that the assessment order in this case has been passed ex-parte u/s 144 and the Ld. CIT(A) has also dismissed the appeal ex-parte, therefore one more opportunity be granted to the assessee to substantiate his case before the A.O.

On the other hand, the Ld. Departmental Representative (DR), relied on the orders of lower authorities and submitted that the orders were passed ex-parte as the assessee has been non-compliance with the notices issued.

We have heard the rival submissions, and perused the materials available on record. On perusal of the order of the Ld. CIT(A), we find that the Ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the additions of cash deposits of Rs.68,89,500/- u/s. 69A of the Act, and estimate of business income @ 2% of the gross receipts credited in the bank account of Rs.19,49,490/-, due to the non-compliance of notices issued. The opinion, and keeping in view the principles of natural justice, the assessee be provided with another opportunity of hearing to substantiate his case before the A.O subject to payment of costs of Rs.10,000/-. The same shall be paid by the assessee to Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority at Hon’ble High Court of Madras within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order and produce the receipt before the A.O. Accordingly, we set aside the orders passed by the A.O and the Ld. CIT(A) and remit the matter back to the file of the A.O for denovo adjudication. We also direct the assessee to appear before the A.O on the date of hearing without fail and furnish complete details for fresh consideration. In view of the above, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 15th day of July, 2025 at Chennai.