DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NUNGAMBAKKAM vs. SATHYABAMA RAMACHANDRAN , ALWARTHIRUNAGAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the amount received for the reduction in profit-sharing ratio in an LLP does not constitute goodwill or a transfer of assets. The amendments made by the Finance Act, 2021, are prospective and not applicable to the assessment year in question.
What were the facts?
The assessee received Rs. 1,98,86,210/- from Elior India Catering LLP, which the Assessing Officer treated as 'Goodwill' and added to the assessee's income. The assessee contended it was compensation for a reduction in profit-sharing ratio in CRCL LLP.
What were the issues?
Whether the amount received for reduction in profit-sharing ratio in an LLP is taxable as goodwill or capital gains. Applicability of amendments made by Finance Act, 2021.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 45,Section 9B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Kettlewell Bullen & Co. Ltd. v. CIT57 citing53 ITR 261 · 1964 · SC · Read judgment
- Sudhakar M. Shetty v. ACIT14 citing130 ITD 197 · 2011 · ITAT
- CIT v. Mansukh Dyeing and Printing Mills7 citing449 ITR 439 · 2022 · SC · Read judgment
- Tax V. Dynamic Enterprises (2013) 40 Taxmann.com 318 (Kar) (iii) Commissioner of Income Tax v. P.N.Panjavani5 citing21 Taxmann.com 458 · 2012 · HC
- 1964) 53 ITR 261 SC 2. Rajendra Babubhai Modi (1993) 200 ITR 98 (Guj HC) 3. CIT v. P.N. Panjawani4 citing110 ITD 410 · 2008 · ITAT
- CIT v. Bharat Heavy Electrical Ltd.4 citing26 Taxmann.com 202 · 2010 · ITAT
- ITO v. Fine Developers4 citing55 SOT 122 · ITAT
- Anik Industries Ltd. v. DCIT3 citing116 Taxmann.com 385 · 2020 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI & SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA
PER MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member): The captioned appeal filed by the revenue is directed against order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 08.02.2025 for Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. The revenue has raised the following legal grounds of appeal:
The order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in ITA. dated 08.02.2025 for the ITBA/NF
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 45
- Mukesh Mishra, Thane vs ACIT, Circle 1, ThaneITA 5853/MUM/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-2021
- Sip Infotech Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 5355/MUM/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2019-2020
- Rajiv Kumar, Delhi vs DCIT, Circle 67(1), DelhiITA 3538/DEL/2026[2011-12]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
- DCIT 19 1 Mumbai, Mumbai vs Nisha Jhaveri, MumbaiITA 2389/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Arokiaswamy Velumani, Bengaluru vs Income Tax Officer 15(3)(1), MumbaiITA 1946/MUM/2026[2023-2024]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2023-2024
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026