DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. CHITRAVEL VETRIMARAN, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding that the seized loose sheets did not constitute 'money, bullion, jewellery or valuable article' as required by Section 69A. The Tribunal also noted the CIT(A)'s finding that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to invoke Section 153C.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions made on account of alleged cash loan transactions. The Assessing Officer initiated proceedings under section 153C based on incriminating materials seized during a search in another person's premises, which indicated cash transactions between the assessee and a film financier.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in deleting additions made under Section 69A based on loose sheets seized from a third party, and whether the Assessing Officer had valid jurisdiction under Section 153C.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153C,Section 69A,Section 132,Section 143(2),Section 142(1),Section 271D,Section 271E,Section 115BBE
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(21)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society1,589 citing250 Taxmann 225 · 2017 · SC
- Dhakeshwari Cotton Mills Ltd. v. CIT1,061 citing26 ITR 775 · 1954 · SC
- K.P. Varghese v. ITO989 citing131 ITR 597 · 1981 · SC
- CIT v. Calcutta Knitwears528 citing43 Taxmann.com 446 · 2014 · SC · Read judgment
- CBI v. V.C. Shukla442 citing3 SCC 410 · 1998 · SC
- CIT v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society254 citing235 Taxmann 163 · 2015 · HC
- Mumbai), DCIT v. Vipin Aggarwal237 citing82 ITD 85 · 2002 · ITAT
- Parimisetti Seetharamamma v. CIT142 citing57 ITR 532 · 1965 · SC · Read judgment
- Chandigarh), S.P Goyal v. DCIT122 citing74 ITD 298 · 2000 · ITAT
- AGR Investment v. Additional Commissioner115 citing38 Taxmann 190 · 1998 · SC
- T.S Venkatesan v. ACIT102 citing67 TTJ 247 · 2000 · ITAT
- Super Malls P. Ltd. v. PCIT-8, New Delhi94 citing115 Taxmann.com 105 · 2020 · SC
- Ltd Vs. DCIT (2007) 107 TTJ (Chennai) 200, Regency Mahavir Properties v. ACIT78 citing190 TTJ 681 · 2017 · ITAT
- MM Financiers (P) Ltd. v. DCIT70 citing169 ITD 35 · 2018 · ITAT
- 373 (Delhi-Trib), Satkar Fincap Ltd. v. ACIT CC-21, New Delhi69 citing52 Taxmann.com 220 · 2014 · HC
- Mumbai), ACIT v. Katrina Rosemary Turcotte58 citing83 Taxmann.com 6 · 2017 · ITAT
- ACIT v. Satyapal Wassan30 citing5 DTR 202 · 2008
- Pr.CIT v. Rajeev Behi30 citing231 Taxmann 58 · 2015 · HC
- Singh v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Central29 citing454 ITR 595 · 2023 · SC
- CBI v. VC Shukla & Others12 citing77 Taxmann.com 254 · 2017 · SC
- 98 ITR 1947 citing98 ITR 194
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, CHEΝΝΑΙ
Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE KAND SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA
PER GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT:
These appeals at the instance of the Revenue is directed against the consolidated order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 19, Chennai dated 17.01.2025, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called 'the Act'). The relevant Assessment Years are 2017-18 & 2019-20. 2. The common issues are involved in these appeals, h
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026