SHRI V. NATARAJAN (INDIVIDUAL),RASIPURAM vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, SALEM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the assessment was completed/unabated at the time of search, additions could not be made in the absence of incriminating material found during the search, following the Supreme Court's decision in PCIT v. Abhisar Buildwell (P) Ltd.
What were the facts?
A search was conducted on the assessee's premises, and subsequently, assessments were framed under Section 153A. The assessee's original return was processed under Section 143(1) and no notice under Section 143(2) was issued before the search.
What were the issues?
Whether additions made under Section 153A are valid in the absence of incriminating material when the assessment was completed/unabated prior to the search.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153A,Section 143(3),Section 143(2),Section 68,Section 115BBE,Section 54F,Section 271(1)(c)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(23)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Kabul Chawla3,235 citing380 ITR 573 · 2016 · HC · Read judgment
- Pr. CIT v. Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd.2,379 citing454 ITR 212 · 2023 · SC
- CIT v. Continental Warehousing Corporation (Nhava Sheva) Ltd.1,823 citing374 ITR 645 · 2015 · HC
- Radhasoami Satsang v. CIT1,695 citing193 ITR 321 · 1992 · SC
- Pr. CIT v. Meeta Gutgutia1,226 citing395 ITR 526 · 2017 · HC
- (Central)-1 v. NRA Iron & Steel (P) Ltd.696 citing412 ITR 161 · 2019 · SC
- Pr. CIT v. Saumya Constructions (P.)Ltd.670 citing387 ITR 529 · 2016 · HC
- Kale Khan Mohammad Hanif v. CIT581 citing50 ITR 1 · 1963 · SC
- CIT v. Precision Finance Pvt. Ltd.427 citing208 ITR 465 · 1994 · HC
- CIT v. Gurinder Singh Bawa416 citing386 ITR 483 · 2016 · HC
- CIT v. Odeon Builders Pvt. ltd.408 citing110 Taxmann.com 64 · 2019 · SC
- Nemi Chand Kothari v. CIT340 citing264 ITR 254 · 2003 · HC
- Jai Steel (India) v. ACIT224 citing259 CTR 281 · 2013 · HC
- CIT v. SKS Ispat & Power Ltd.149 citing398 ITR 584 · 2017 · HC
- Vipan Khanna v. CIT140 citing255 ITR 220 · 2002 · HC
- Indulata Rangwala v. DCIT123 citing384 ITR 337 · 2016 · HC
- Pr. CIT v. Dipak Jashvantlal Panchal99 citing397 ITR 153 · 2017 · HC
- Chintels India Ltd. v. DCIT83 citing397 ITR 416 · 2017 · HC · Read judgment
- Mani Square Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, CC-3(2), Kolkata24 citing118 Taxmann.com 452 · 2020 · ITAT
- 16 citing
- PCIT v. Capgemini India (P) Ltd.15 citing90 Taxmann.com 409 · 2018 · HC
- 3/52 GST 355 & CIT v. Odeon Builders (P.) Ltd.11 citing266 Taxmann 461 · 2019 · SC
- ACIT Central Circle-2(2), Chennai v. RPD Earth MoveRs. Pvt Ltd.11 citing101 Taxmann.com 89 · 2019 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI & SHRI JAGADISH
PER MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM: The captioned appeals filed by the assessee are directed against order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Chennai-20 [‘CIT(A)’ in short] dated 30.04.2024 & 25.05.2024 for Assessment Years 2016-17 & 2015-16. 2. Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in ITA No.1535/Chny/2024 for AY 2016-17 are as under:
ITA Nos.1535 & 1801/Chny/2024 (AYs 2016-17 & 2015-16) Var
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Similar judgments
Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.
- Varadappan Natarajan, Rasipuram vs ACIT, Central Circle, SalemChennai31 Oct 2025Allowed
The Tribunal held that since the assessment was completed/unabated at the time of search, additions could not be made in the absence of incriminating material found during the search, following the Supreme Court's decisi...
- DCIT, New Delhi vs M/S. Moet Hennessy (I) Pvt. Ltd., MumbaiDelhi13 Dec 2019Allowed
Also relies on Municipal Corporation of City of Thane v. Vidyut Metallics Ltd. & Anr.
The Tribunal held that the disallowance of AMP expenditure was not sustainable. It noted that the Bright Line Test (BLT) used by the TPO has been discarded by higher courts and that similar AMP expenses had been allowed ...
- DCIT, New Delhi vs M/S. Anjala Exhibitors Pvt. Ltd., New DelhiDelhi6 Oct 2017Allowed
Also relies on Municipal Corporation of City of Thane v. Vidyut Metallics Ltd. & Anr.
The Tribunal held that the income derived from letting out the cinema building to PVR Ltd. should be treated as 'Income from House Property'. The Tribunal followed its earlier decisions for preceding assessment years on ...
- Friends Bulk Handlers Ltd., Gandhidham vs The Dy. Commr. of Income Tax, Cen…Rajkot25 Mar 2022Allowed
Also relies on Mani Square Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, CC-3(2), Kolkata
The Tribunal held that in cases of unabated assessments, additions under section 153A are permissible only if based on incriminating material found during the search. Since no such material was found, the PCIT erred in i...
- Glen Propbuild Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs DCIT, Circle- 10(1), New DelhiDelhi17 Apr 2023Allowed
Also relies on Indulata Rangwala v. DCIT
The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were initiated after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, and the reasons recorded indicated a change of opinion by the Assessing Offi...
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026