THE SALEM URBAN COOP BANK LTD.,SALEM vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), SALEM

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2673/CHNY/2025Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 December 2025AY 2018-195 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal admitted the additional evidence filed by the assessee, including details of Form 15G/15H and proof of subsequent online filing. The matter was restored to the file of the Assessing Officer (AO) for verification of substantial compliance with Section 197A(2) of the Act by uploading the Form 15G/15H online. The assessee was directed to submit all supporting evidence to the AO. The AO was instructed not to treat the assessee in default if it was found that the assessee had e-filed Form 15G/15H and made substantial compliance with Section 197A. The ratio decidendi is that substantial compliance with procedural requirements, especially when supported by evidence of subsequent rectification and admission of additional evidence, can warrant a review by the AO to avoid penalizing the assessee for technical lapses.

What were the facts?

The assessee, The Salem Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd., is appealing an order from the Addl. CIT(A) dated 02.07.2025, which arose from an order passed by the ITO-TDS under sections 201(1)/201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. A demand of Rs. 1,98,84,649/- was raised for non-deduction of TDS on interest paid exceeding Rs. 10,000/- in FY 2017-18, or for failure to upload Form 15G/15H online. The AO noted a survey under section 133(2A) regarding the new rule for online filing of these forms. The assessee claimed physical copies of Form 15G/15H for FY 2017-18 were submitted to the Department, preventing online upload due to technical glitches. The Addl. CIT(A) confirmed the demand, stating he lacked the power to set aside the matter under section 251(1A).

What were the issues?

1. Whether the assessee can be treated as an assessee in default for non-deduction of TDS on interest paid exceeding Rs. 10,000/- in FY 2017-18, when it obtained Form 15G/15H in physical form and submitted it to the Income-tax Department, thereby failing to upload the forms online as per the new rule? (Question of law and fact, turning on Section 197A(2) and Section 201(1)/201(1A)). Assessee's Contention: The assessee argued that there was no default in TDS deduction as Form 15G/15H were obtained in physical form and submitted to the Department. They further contended that subsequent online uploading was attempted but acknowledgment was not generated due to technical issues. They sought admission of additional evidence to prove e-filing and requested the AO to delete the demand upon verification of substantial compliance with Section 197A(2). Revenue's Contention: The Revenue relied on the orders of the lower authorities, arguing that online uploading of forms was mandatory, and mere submission of paper forms did not absolve the assessee of its statutory liability.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 197A(2),Section 201(1),Section 201(1A),Section 133(2A),Section 251(1A)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI

Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI JAGADISH

आदेश / O R D E R

PER JAGADISH, A.M : Aforesaid appeal filed by the assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19 arises out of the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax, Addl./JCIT(A)-1, Kolkata [hereinafter “Addl. CIT(A)”] dated 02.07.2025.

2.

The assessee is a Co-operative Bank Ltd. engaged in the banking business. The ITO–TDS, in the order passed u/s. 201(1)/201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), has raised a demand of Rs. 1,98,84,649/- for non deduction of TDS on interest paid for more than Rs.10,000/ in F.Y 2017-18 or failure to upload Form 15G/15H on the e-filing portal incase tax was not deducted. The A.O. noted in the order that a survey u/s 133(2A) of the Act was conducted on 13.02.2019 regarding compliance with the new rule requiring online filing of Form 15G/15H through the e-filing portal in cases where tax was not deducted. The assessee submitted that Form 15G/15H relating to F.Ys. 2017–18 along with other details, had been furnished physically to the Department, and that those forms were still lying with the Department. Hence, the assessee was unable to upload the details online on the e-filing portal. It was explained that the forms could not be uploaded since the physical copies were already with the Department and subsequently there was technical glitch in uploading the forms. On appeal, the Ld. Addl. CIT(A)

1.

1. confirmed the order and declined to set aside matter to A.O stating that he does not have power to set aside u/s 251(1A) of the Act.

3.

At the outset, the Learned Authorized Representative (Ld. A.R.)

1.

submitted that there is no default in deducting the tax on interest as it has obtained Form 15G/15H in physical form for not deducting the TDS. The Ld AR submitted that the forms could not be uploaded on the portal because the physical copies had already been submitted before the Income-tax Department and subsequently they have been uploaded, but acknowledgment receipt was not generated by system.

The Ld. A.R. also sought admission of additional evidence under Rule 29 of the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963, including the details of Form 15G/15H and evidence showing that the relevant forms were subsequently uploaded in Form 27A. Accordingly, it was requested that the additional evidence be admitted and AO may be directed to delete the demand after verification that Forms have now been uploaded and substantial compliance of section 197A(2) has been made.

4.

The Ld. Departmental Representative (DR), on the other hand, relied on the orders of the lower authorities. He submitted that the assessee was mandatorily required to upload the forms online and that mere submission of paper forms does not absolve the assessee of its statutory liability.

5.

We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. The assessee has contended assessee has obtained Form 15G/15H from the parties whom interest of more than Rs.10,000/- has been made, in physical form and has also been submitted to the office of the Income-tax Department, Salem. The Ld A.R therefore contended that assessee cannot be treated as assessee in default for non deduction of TDS. The A.O has treated the assessee in default as Form 15G/Form15H has not been filled online. The assessee has now filed additional evidence in support of its claim that Form 15G/15H has been subsequently e-filed and it has now received acknowledgment for having filled the same. We admit the additional evidences in the interest of justice and restore the matter to the file of the A.O. to verify whether substantial compliance of section 197A(2) of the Act has been made by uploading the Form 15G/15H online. The assessee is directed to submit all the evidences in support of its claim before A.O, who will not treat assessee in default in case it is found that assessee has e-filed Form-15G/15H and substantial compliance of section 197A has been made.

6.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on 04th day of December, 2025 at Chennai.

More judgments on Section 201(1)

All 3,835 judgments and leading authorities on Section 201(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →