ACIT, SPECIAL RANG-2, NEW DELHI vs. CLIXXO BROADBAND PVT. LTD., DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had obtained Form No. 3 under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. As per Section 4(2) of the Act, appeals pending before the Tribunal are deemed to be withdrawn upon issuance of the certificate.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed two appeals before the ITAT for assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12. The assessee had settled the matter under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether appeals pending before the ITAT are deemed withdrawn upon the assessee opting for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘B’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI O.P. KANT
ORDER PER O.P. KANT, AM:
These two appeals by the Revenue are directed against the common order dated 31.03.2017 passed by learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, New Delhi, for assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12. 2. We have heard learned Representative of both the parties through Video Conferencing. 3. Learned counsel for the assessee, at the outset, stated that the assessee has settled the matter under the “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020” and Form no. 3 has also been issued in favour of the assessee. He, therefore, seeks permission to treat both the appeals as deemed to be withdrawn under the provisions of Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
We have perused the Form No. 3 issued by Income-tax Department with reference to present appeals. The Section 4(2) of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act (supra) reads as under: “4. (1) ………………………. (2) Upon the filing the declaration, any appeal pending before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal or Commissioner (Appeals), in respect of the disputed income or disputed interest or disputed penalty or disputed fee and tax arrear shall be deemed to have been withdrawn from the date on which certificate under sub-section (1) of section 5 is issued by the designated authority.”
4. In view of the above, as the Form No. 3 have been issued in the case of the assessee, both the appeals of the Revenue are deemed to be withdrawn. Hence, both the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open Court.
More judgments on Section 4(2)
- M/S. Gladiator Commodities Pvt. Ltd… vs DCIT, Central Circle-4(1), Kolkata, IndiaITA 1050/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed2 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Smt. Reeta Dubey, Jaunpur vs Income Tax Officer - II, JaunpurITA 128/VNS/2025[2012-2013]Status: Disposed23 Jul 2026AY 2012-2013
- Ashwani Sood, Patiala vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - Nabha, NabhaITA 801/CHANDI/2025[2009-10]Status: Disposed16 Apr 2026AY 2009-10
- Rasar Biogenetics, Hyderabad vs ITO., Ward-10(1), HyderabadITA 1266/HYD/2025[2016-2017]Status: Disposed7 Jan 2026AY 2016-2017
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026