THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LIMITED,ELURU vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), VISAKHAPATNAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that orders imposing penalty under Section 271FA are appealable before the CIT(A) as per Section 246A(q) of the Act. Consequently, the CIT(A)'s dismissal orders were set aside.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against orders imposing penalty under Section 271FA. The CIT(A) dismissed these appeals, holding that orders under Section 271FA were not appealable.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether an order imposing penalty under Section 271FA of the Income Tax Act is appealable before the CIT(A).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI V. DURGA RAO, HON’BLE & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, HON’BLE
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos. 576 to 578/VIZ/2018 (Asst. Year : 2014-15 to 2016-17) The District Co-operative vs. DIT (I & CI), Central Bank Ltd., R.R. Peta, Hyderabad. Eluru, W.G. District. PAN No. AADAT 1078 R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri G.V.N. Hari – Advocate. Department By : Smt. Suman Malik – Sr.DR Date of hearing : 22/03/2019. Date of pronouncement : 27/03/2019. O R D E R PER V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER These appeals by the assessee are directed against the common order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Rajamahendravaram, dated 24/10/2018 for the Assessment Years 2014-15 to 2016-17. Since, facts are identical and issues are common, they are clubbed, heard together and disposed of by way of this common order for the sake of convenience. 2. The only issue involved in these appeals is whether penalty levied under section 271FA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "Act") is appealable before the ld.CIT(A) or not. According to the ld. CIT(A), the order is not
2 ITA No.576-578/VIZ/2018 (The District Co-op Central Bank Ltd.)
appealable because the order is passed by the DCIT (I & CI) under section 271FA of the Act. Accordingly, appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed. 3. On appeal before us, ld. counsel for the assessee has submitted that as per section 246A(q), the appealable orders before the ld. CIT(A) including the order imposing penalty under Chapter XXI. Chapter XXI provides that 271FA is an appealable order. We, therefore, by considering the provisions of the Act, the order passed by the Director of Income Tax (I & CI), Hyderabad dated 21/04/2017 is an appealable order. Thus, we find that the order passed by the ld. CIT(A) in dismissing the appeals of the assessee dated 24/10/2018 is not in accordance with law. Therefore, we set aside the orders passed by the ld. CIT(A) and direct him to adjudicate the appeals on merits in accordance with law. Thus, these appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. 4. In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. Order Pronounced in open Court on this 27th day of March, 2019.
Sd/- sd/- (D.S. SUNDER SINGH) (V. DURGA RAO) Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated: 27th March, 2019.
3 ITA No.576-578/VIZ/2018 (The District Co-op Central Bank Ltd.)
vr/- Copy to: 1. The Assessee-The District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd., R.R. Peta, Eluru, W.G. District. 2. The Revenue – DCIT (I & CI), Hyderabad. 3. The Pr.CIT, Rajamahendravaram. 4. The CIT(A), Rajamahendravaram. 5. The D.R., Visakhapatnam. 6. Guard file. By order
(VUKKEM RAMBABU) Sr. Private Secretary, ITAT, Visakhapatnam.
More judgments on Section 271FA
- Shree Kadi Nagarik Sahakari Bank Ltd, Kadi vs Addl/Jdit(I&Ci), AhmedabadITA 1258/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shree Kadi Nagarik Sahakari Bank Ltd, Kadi vs Addl/Jdit(I&Ci), AhmedabadITA 1257/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sub-Registrar Office Siyana, Siyana vs Joint Director of Income Tax, I&Ci, KanpurITA 6467/DEL/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Bangiya Gramin Vikash Bank (Presently Known… vs ITO, Ward 42(1), MurshidabadITA 2592/KOL/2025[2022-2023]Status: Disposed26 Feb 2026AY 2022-2023
- Bangiya Gramin Vikash Bank (Presently Known… vs JCIT(I & Ci) - 1, KolkataITA 2591/KOL/2025[2021-2022]Status: Disposed26 Feb 2026AY 2021-2022
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026