RADHEY SHYAM KESHAN,KANPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(5), BETTIAH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order. In the interest of justice, the assessee was granted one more opportunity to present their case before the CIT(A).
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was decided ex-parte without providing an opportunity of hearing. The assessee's representative requested another opportunity to present their case.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex-parte order without affording the assessee an opportunity of hearing.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA BENCH, PATNA
Before: SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JM & SHRI L.P. SAHU, AM
आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण,पटना �यायपीठ,पटना IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PATNA BENCH, PATNA �ी च�� मोहन गग�, �या�यक सद�य एवं �ी एल.पी.साहु, लेखा सद�य के सम� । BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JM AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, AM आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.89/PAT/2019 (�नधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year :2015-2016) Radhe Shyam Kesan, Kanpur- Vs. ITO Ward-1(5),Bettiah 208011. �थायी लेखा सं./PAN No. : ACNPK8625L (अपीलाथ� /Appellant) (��यथ� / Respondent) ..
: Shri K.M.Mishra & Sh. Alok िनधा�रती की ओर से /Assessee by Kumar, AR राज�व क� ओर से /Revenue by : Shri Supriya Biswas, DR सुनवाई क� तार�ख / Date of Hearing : 18/09/2019 घोषणा क� तार�ख/ 19/09/2019 : Date of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: This appeal is filed by the assessee assailing the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bettiah, dated17.01.2019 for the assessment year 2015-16. 2. At the outset, ld. AR submitted that the CIT(A) has passed the ex- parte order without providing any opportunity of hearing. Therefore, the ld. AR prayed for an opportunity to represent its case before the CIT(A). 3. On the other hand, ld. DR relied on the orders of lower authorities. 4. We have heard the rival submissions of both the parties and perused the relevant material placed in the record of the Tribunal. We find that the ld. CIT(A) has passed the impugned order ex-parte. Ld. AR
2 ITA No. 89/PAT/2019 before the Bench submitted that the assessee may be provided one more opportunity to substantiate its claim before the CIT(A). Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice and fair- play, there will be no prejudice to the Revenue if one more opportunity be granted to the assessee to represent its case before the CIT(A). Accordingly, we restore the appeal of the assessee to the file of CIT(A) to pass a speaking and reasoned order considering the findings of AO and the submissions of the assessee, after providing sufficient opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to cooperate with the CIT(A) in early disposal of the case. 5. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 19 /09/2019. Sd/- Sd/- (C.M.GARG) (L.P.SAHU) �या�यक सद�य / JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा सद�य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पटना /Patna; �दनांक Dated 19 /09/2019 S.sinha(P.S) आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ� / The Appellant- . 1. ��यथ� / The Respondent- 2. 3. आयकर आयु�(अपील) / The CIT(A), आयकर आयु�त / CIT 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पटना / DR, ITAT, Patna 5. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. 6. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, स�या�पत ��त //True Copy//
(Private Secretary) ITAT Patna Bench, Patna
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026