RAMBHA DEVI,SAMASTIPUR vs. ITO, WARD-3(4), SAMASTIPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 52/PAT/2019Status: DisposedITAT Patna19 September 2019AY 2013-142 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had passed an ex-parte order. In the interest of justice, the Tribunal restored the appeal to the CIT(A) to provide the assessee with a sufficient opportunity of hearing.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was decided ex-parte without providing an opportunity of hearing. The assessee's representative requested another chance to present their case before the CIT(A).

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex-parte order without affording the assessee an adequate opportunity of hearing.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA BENCH, PATNA

Before: SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JM & SHRI L.P.SAHU, AM

For Appellant: Shri K.N.Prasad, AR, Shri Supriya Biswas, JCIT-DR
For Respondent: Shri Supriya Biswas, JCIT-DR
Hearing: 18/09/2019

आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण,पटना न्यायपीठ,पटना IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PATNA BENCH, PATNA श्री चन्द्र मोहन गगग, न्द्याययक सदस्य एवं श्री एल.पी.साहु, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष । BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JM & SHRI L.P.SAHU, AM आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.52/PAT/2019 (ननिाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2013-2014) Rambha Devi, Vs. ITO, Ward-3(4), Prop: M/s Medicine Home, Samastipur Rosera, Samastipur-848210 स्थायी लेखा सं./PAN No. : AHDPD 2785 K (अपीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

निर्धारिती की ओर से /Assessee by : Shri K.N.Prasad, AR राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue by : Shri Supriya Biswas, JCIT-DR सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 18/09/2019 घोषणा की तारीख/ : 19/09/2019 Date of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: This appeal is filed by the assessee assailing the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Muzaffarpur, dated 17.01.2019 for the assessment year 2013-2014. 2. At the outset, ld. AR submitted that the CIT(A) has passed the ex- parte order without providing any opportunity of hearing. Therefore, the ld. AR prayed for an opportunity to represent its case before the CIT(A). 3. On the other hand, ld. DR relied on the orders of lower authorities. 4. We have heard the rival submissions of both the parties and perused the relevant material placed in the record of the Tribunal. We find that the ld. CIT(A) has passed the impugned order ex-parte. Ld. AR

2 ITA No.52/PAT/2019 before the Bench submitted that the assessee may be provided one more opportunity to substantiate its claim before the CIT(A). Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice and fair- play, there will be no prejudice to the Revenue if one more opportunity be granted to the assessee to represent its case before the CIT(A). Accordingly, we restore the appeal of the assessee to the file of CIT(A) to pass a speaking and reasoned order considering the findings of AO and the submissions of the assessee, after providing sufficient opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to cooperate with the CIT(A) in early disposal of the case. 5. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 19/09/2019. Sd/- Sd/- (L.P.SAHU) (C.M.GARG) लेखा सदस्य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER न्यानयक सदस्य / JUDICIAL MEMBER पटना /Patna; ददनांक Dated 19/09/2019 Prakash Kumar Mishra, Sr.PS(on tour) आदेश की प्रनिललपप अग्रेपर्ि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथी / The Appellant- . 1. प्रत्यथी / The Respondent- 2. आयकि आयुक्त(अपील) / The CIT(A), 3. आयकर आयुक्त / CIT 4. निभधगीय प्रनतनिनर्, आयकि अपीलीय अनर्किण, पटना / DR, ITAT, Patna 5. गार्ग फाईल / Guard file. 6. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, सत्यापपत प्रयत //True Copy// (Senior Private Secretary) ITAT Patna Bench, Patna

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →