KARISHMA GOYAL,RANCHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2, BEGUSARAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the appeal to the CIT(A) with a direction to pass a speaking and reasoned order after providing sufficient opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was dismissed ex-parte by the CIT(A) without providing an opportunity of hearing. The assessee's representative requested another chance to present their case.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex-parte order without affording an opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA BENCH, PATNA
Before: SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JM & SHRI L.P. SAHU, AM
आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण,पटना �यायपीठ,पटना IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PATNA BENCH, PATNA �ी च�� मोहन गग�, �या�यक सद�य एवं �ी एल.पी.साहु, लेखा सद�य के सम� । BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JM AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, AM आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.145/PAT/2019 (�नधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year :2015-2016) Karishma Goyal, Ranchi. Vs. ACIT Circle-2,Begusarai. �थायी लेखा सं./PAN No. : AGCPG7450J (अपीलाथ� /Appellant) (��यथ� / Respondent) ..
: Shri K.M.Mishra & Sh. Alok िनधा�रती की ओर से /Assessee by Kumar, AR राज�व क� ओर से /Revenue by : Shri Supriya Biswas, DR सुनवाई क� तार�ख / Date of Hearing : 18/09/2019 घोषणा क� तार�ख/ 19/09/2019 : Date of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: This appeal is filed by the assessee assailing the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Bhagalpur, dated11.12.2017 for the assessment year 2015-16. 2. At the outset, ld. AR submitted that the CIT(A) has passed the ex- parte order without providing any opportunity of hearing. Therefore, the ld. AR prayed for an opportunity to represent its case before the CIT(A). 3. On the other hand, ld. DR relied on the orders of lower authorities. 4. We have heard the rival submissions of both the parties and perused the relevant material placed in the record of the Tribunal. We find that the ld. CIT(A) has passed the impugned order ex-parte. Ld. AR
2 ITA No. 145/PAT/2019 before the Bench submitted that the assessee may be provided one more opportunity to substantiate its claim before the CIT(A). Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice and fair- play, there will be no prejudice to the Revenue if one more opportunity be granted to the assessee to represent its case before the CIT(A). Accordingly, we restore the appeal of the assessee to the file of CIT(A) to pass a speaking and reasoned order considering the findings of AO and the submissions of the assessee, after providing sufficient opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to cooperate with the CIT(A) in early disposal of the case. 5. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 19 /09/2019. Sd/- Sd/- (C.M.GARG) (L.P.SAHU) �या�यक सद�य / JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा सद�य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पटना /Patna; �दनांक Dated :19 /09/2019 S.sinha(P.S) आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ� / The Appellant- . 1. ��यथ� / The Respondent- 2. 3. आयकर आयु�(अपील) / The CIT(A), आयकर आयु�त / CIT 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पटना / DR, ITAT, Patna 5. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. 6. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, स�या�पत ��त //True Copy//
( Private Secretary) ITAT Patna Bench, Patna
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026