RANJIT KUMAR,NAWADA vs. ITO, WARD-2(5), BIHARSHARIF

PDF · subscribers
ITA 232/PAT/2018Status: DisposedITAT Patna19 September 2019AY 2014-152 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the appeal to the file of the Assessing Officer to pass a speaking and reasoned order after providing the assessee with an opportunity of hearing. The assessee was directed to cooperate with the AO.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2014-2015. The assessee did not appear before the lower authorities, leading to ex-parte orders.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present their case before the Assessing Officer due to non-appearance before lower authorities.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 144

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA BENCH, PATNA

Before: SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JM & SHRI L.P.SAHU, AM

For Appellant: Shri Supriya Biswas, JCIT-DR
For Respondent: Shri Supriya Biswas, JCIT-DR
Hearing: 18/09/2019

Per Bench: This appeal is filed by the assessee assailing the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-I, Patna, dated 09.07.2018 for the assessment year 2014-2015. 2. None appeared on behalf of the assessee even the case was called for second round of hearing. Therefore, we proceeded to dispose off the appeal of the assessee after considering the submissions of ld.DR and the material evidence available on record.

3.

On careful consideration of the submissions of ld. DR and perusing the relevant material placed in the record of the Tribunal along with the orders of both the authorities below, at the outset, we find that the ld. CIT(A) has passed the impugned order ex-parte. Even on perusal of the 2 assessment order, we find that the Assessing Officer has passed the assessment order u/s.144 of the Act. From the above it is clear, that the assessee did not appear before both the authorities below to substantiate its claim. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice and fair-play, there will be no prejudice to the Revenue if one more opportunity be granted to the assessee to represent its case before the AO. Accordingly, we restore the appeal of the assessee to the file of AO to pass a speaking and reasoned order considering the submissions of the assessee, after providing sufficient opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to cooperate with the AO positively for early disposal of the case.

4.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 19/09/2019. (L.P.SAHU) (C.M.GARG) ऱेखा सदस्य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER न्यानयक सदस्य / JUDICIAL MEMBER पटना /Patna; ददनांक Dated 19/09/2019 Prakash Kumar Mishra, Sr.PS(on tour) आदेश की प्रनिलऱपप अग्रेपषि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अऩीऱाथी / The Appellant- 2. प्रत्यथी / The Respondent- 3. आयकर आयुक्त(अऩीऱ) / The CIT(A), 4. आयकर आयुक्त / CIT आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, 5. ववभागीय प्रयतयनधध, आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, पटना / DR, ITAT, Patna गार्ग पाईऱ / Guard file.

6.

(Senior Private Secretary) सत्यावऩत प्रयत //// ITAT Patna Bench, Patna

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →