ACIT, NUNGAMBAKKAM vs. INTEGRATED SERVICE POINT LIMITED, ANNA NAGAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the approval for reassessment proceedings for AY 2016-17 was not granted by the competent authority as required by Section 151(ii) of the Income Tax Act. Therefore, the assessment order for that year was invalid.
What were the facts?
During a search operation, unaccounted transactions were found in an Excel sheet on a hard disk. The assessee claimed these transactions were for business expediency and cash expenses, while the revenue treated them as income. A key issue was the validity of the approval for reassessment proceedings.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the approval for reassessment proceedings was obtained from the correct authority as per Section 151(ii), and if not, whether the assessment order was void ab initio. Another issue involved the treatment of transactions found in seized documents.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(11)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- S.A. Builders Ltd. v. CIT1,484 citing288 ITR 1 · 2007 · SC · Read judgment
- Mehta Parikh & Co. v. CIT396 citing30 ITR 181 · 1956 · SC
- CIT v. Indeo Airways Pvt. Ltd.114 citing26 Taxmann.com 244 · 2012 · HC · Read judgment
- 110 (Bom) PCIT v. Hitesh Mody (HUF)98 citing172 Taxmann.com 283 · 2025 · HC
- Ghanshyam K. Khabrani v. ACIT89 citing346 ITR 443 · 2012 · HC
- Navjivan Oil Mills v. CIT75 citing124 Taxmann 392 · 2002 · HC · Read judgment
- Thiru. A. J. Ramesh Kumar v. Dy. CIT29 citing441 ITR 495 · 2022 · HC
- Hyderabad v. Purushottam Jhadhav19 citing40 Taxmann.com 533 · 2013 · HC
- CIT v. South India Corporation Agencies Ltd.14 citing164 Taxmann 249 · 2007 · HC
- FIVES India Engineering & Projects (P) Ltd. v. ITO5 citing464 ITR 760 · HC
- Logamaheshwara v. Income-tax Officer4 citing167 Taxmann.com 320 · 2024 · HC
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण 'सी' न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 'C' BENCH: CHENNAΙ मप्सनीय श्री मनु कुमार गिरि, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं मप्सनीय श्री जगदीश, लेख सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI HON'BLE JAGADISH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ ITA Nos.1881, 1882 & 1883/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years: 2016-17, 2019-20 & 2022-23 The Dy./Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2(4), Chennai. 6C, 6th Floor, Gaiety Palace I/L, Blackers Road, Anna Road H.O., Chennai - 600 002. PAN: AAACI 9527P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./ ITA Nos.1874, 1876 & 1879/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years: 2016-17, 2019-20 & 2022-23 The Dy./Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2(4), 6C, 6th Floor, Gaiety Palace I/L, Blackers Road, Anna Road H.O., Chennai - 600 002. PAN: AAACI 9527P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee by : Mr. Y. Sridhar, FCA प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue by : Mr.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 151
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Rajesh Kumar Khandelwal, Jaipur vs ITO Ward 5(1), JaipurITA 21/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026