THE ITO-5(1), INDORE vs. M/S. SANGHVI METAL PROCESSING AND MANUFACTURING PVT. LTD., INDORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal without going into the merits of the case. This was based on the fact that the tax effect of Rs. 10,65,123/- was below the monetary limit of Rs. 20 lacs prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 for filing appeals.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed an order from the CIT(A) which had deleted an addition of Rs. 51,70,500/- made on account of LTCG from sale of agricultural land. The assessee argued the appeal should be dismissed due to low tax effect as per CBDT Circular No. 3/2018.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the Revenue is liable to be dismissed on account of low tax effect as per CBDT Circular No. 3/2018. Whether the sale of agricultural land was liable to tax as LTCG or stock-in-trade.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: Shri Kul Bharat, Hon’ble & Shri Manish Borad, Hon’ble
per this circular department shall not file the appeal before the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in case the effect of tax does
not exceed the monetary limit of Rs.20 lacs. It is further specified
Sanghvi Metal Processing and Manufacturing Pvt.Ltd ITA 416/Ind/2017 in Para 13 of the CBDT Circular No.3/2018 that the circular will
also apply retrospectively on all the pending appeals/cross
objections if the tax effect is below the specified tax limit and such
appeals shall be withdrawn/not processed. It is also accepted by
both the parties that the issue raised in this appeal does not fall in
any of the exceptions provided in para 10 of the circular. We
therefore without going in to the merits of the case, dismiss the revenue’s appeal in lemine on account of low tax effect.
In the result appeal of the revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in open Court on 26 July, 2018.
Sd/- Sd/- ( KUL BHARAT) (MANISH BORAD) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER July 26 , 2018 /Dev
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026