ACIT WARDHA CIRCLE, WARDHA vs. JAMNALAL SONS PVT LID., WARDHA
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeals filed by the Revenue were not maintainable due to the low tax effect. The CBDT circular regarding the monetary limit applies retrospectively to pending appeals.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals before the ITAT. However, the tax effect in these appeals was below the monetary limit of Rs. 20 lakh set by the CBDT for filing appeals.
What were the issues?
Whether appeals filed by the Revenue are maintainable when the tax effect is below the prescribed monetary limit set by the CBDT, and if the CBDT circular applies retrospectively.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
HS IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NAGPUR BENCH; NAGPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN; JUDICIAL MEMBER & HON'BLE SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos. 495/NAG/2014 (Asst; Year : 2008-09) ITO, Ward-4(4)- Erstwhile WD 6(1}, 3rd floor, Aayakar Bhavan Nagpur. VS_ Shri Vijay Dangre , Plot No_ 428, Anand Nagar, Near Sangam Talkies, Sakkardara, Nagpur PAN No. ACJPD8I9SN ITA No. 261/NAG/2015 (Asst: Year 2012-13) 2 ACIT Wardha Circle, Aayakar Bhavan. Civil Lines, Wardha, Pin-442001 Vs. Jamnalal Sons Pvt: Ltd. Bachharaj Bhavan, Cachhraj Road, Gandhi Chowk, Wardha Pin-442001 PAN No. AAACJ3176H (Respondents) {Appeilants} Department By Assessee by Respective DRs Respective ARs Date of hearing Date Of pronouncement: 25/10/2018, 25/10/2018. @RPER PER BENCH The above listed appeals at the instance of the Revenue are directed against the respective impugned orders passed by the NaGPur 52 2 Commissianer of Income Tax (Appeals) for respective Ld; respective Assessment Years as indicated above: In all the above appeals, revenue has moved an application 2, for withdrawing the above appeals as the tax effect pertaining to the amount disputed by the Revenue is less than the monetary Rs. 20 lakh fixed by the CBDT in Circular No. 03/2018, limit of which is in supersession of its Circular No_ dated 11/07/2018, 21/2015 dated 10/12/2015, in relation to filing of appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal: Taking irito consideration the also the fact that the CBDT Circular under reference above, and applies retrospectively even to pending appeals, we hold that the Revenue are not maintainable bove listed appeals filed by the Iiable to be dismissed in limine: M TpWa In the net result, the above listed appeals of the Revenue 3 stands dismissed, It is ordered accordingly. Order Pronounced in open Court o this 25th October , 2018. - Sdf - (G. MANJUNATHA) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated 8 25 October, 2018, Sr.PS.Dhananjay
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026