AMRUT WAMAN ALHAT,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2(3), PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the right of appeal is statutory and the assessees demonstrated seriousness in pursuing their appeals. Therefore, an opportunity of being heard should be granted.
What were the facts?
The assessees filed appeals against ex-parte assessment orders made under Section 144 read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The assessees could not appear before the CIT(A) for justifiable reasons and sought one more opportunity to be heard.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessees should be granted an opportunity to be heard before the lower authorities, given the ex-parte nature of the assessment orders and the reasons for non-appearance.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE
Before: SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM & SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM
Heard together (4 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे �यायपीठ “एक-सद�य मामला” पुणे म� IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM AND SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JM आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.1702/PUN/2018 िनधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year : 2009-10 Sarika Kailash Alhat, S.No.26, Opp. Buddha Vihar, Bopodi, Pune- 411003. .......अपीलाथ� / Appellant PAN : CBHPA5315E बनाम / V/s. ITO, Ward- 2(3), ……��यथ� / Respondent Pune. आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.1703/PUN/2018 िनधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year : 2009-10 Amrut Waman Alhat, S.No.26, Opp. Buddha Vihar, Bopodi, Pune- 411003. .......अपीलाथ� / Appellant PAN : AVDPA3877H बनाम / V/s. ITO, Ward- 2(3), ……��यथ� / Respondent Pune. आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.1704/PUN/2018 िनधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year : 2009-10 Ushatai Kailash Alhat, S.No.26, Opp. Buddha Vihar, Bopodi, Pune- 411003. .......अपीलाथ� / Appellant PAN : AGIPA1385Q बनाम / V/s. ITO, Ward- 2(3), ……��यथ� / Respondent Pune.
2 ITA Nos.1702 to 1705/PUN/2018 आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.1705/PUN/2018 िनधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year : 2009-10 Bharat Kailash Alhat, S.No.26, Opp. Buddha Vihar, Bopodi, Pune- 411003. .......अपीलाथ� / Appellant PAN : AYNPA7000P बनाम / V/s. ITO, Ward- 2(3), ……��यथ� / Respondent Pune. Assessee by : Shri Pramod Shingte Revenue by : Shri M. K. Verma सुनवाई क� तारीख / Date of Hearing : 06.02.2019 घोषणा क� तारीख / Date of Pronouncement : 07.02.2019 आदेश / ORDER PER D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM: There are four appeals under consideration. All these appeals relate to the same group of family filed with common grounds of appeal for the assessment year 2009-10. 2. Without going to the grounds of appeal, at the outset, ld. Counsel for the assessee brought our attention to the assessment orders mentioned that the same are ex-parte orders made u/s 144 r.w.s. 147 of the Act. Further, he mentioned that the assessees could not appear before the CIT(A) with justifiable reasons, therefore, the appeals were adjudicated ex-parte. On these facts, ld. Counsel made a statement at Bar that this time the assessee would make proper representation before the lower authorities and pleaded for grant of one more opportunity of being heard to the assessees. 3. Considering the above facts as well as objection of the ld. DR for the Revenue, we are of the opinion that the right of filing the appeal is granted by
3 ITA Nos.1702 to 1705/PUN/2018 the Statute to the assessee-taxpayers. In this case, the assessees wanted to invoke the said right and paid the appeal fees in this regard conveying their seriousness of pursuing the appeals. Therefore, we are of the opinion that an opportunity should be granted to the assessees under consideration. Accordingly, we remand all the issues raised by the assessees in their respective appeals to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The Assessing Officer shall grant a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessees. Accordingly, the grounds raised by the assessees in all the four appeals are allowed for statistical purposes. 4. In the result, all the four appeals of the respective assessees are allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 07th February, 2019. Sd/- Sd/- (PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY) (D. KARUNAKARA RAO) �याियक सद�य/JUDICIAL MEMBER लेखा सद�य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / Pune; �दनांक / Dated : 07th February, 2019 Sujeet आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ� / The Appellant; 1. ��यथ� / The Respondent; 2. 3. The CIT(A)-3, Pune; 4. The Pr. CCIT, Pune; िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे “एक-सद�य मामला” 5. / DR ‘SMC’, ITAT, Pune; गाड� फाईल / Guard file. 6. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026