ASG TRUST,BENGALURU vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTIONS, BENGALURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(E) rejected the application without providing adequate opportunity of being heard and without seeking additional data or issuing a proper show cause notice. Therefore, the Tribunal remitted the issue back to the CIT(E) to decide afresh after giving the assessee an opportunity to be heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust, formed in 2017 with charitable objectives, applied for final registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemptions) rejected the application, observing that the trust's activities had not commenced and necessary documents were not submitted. The assessee appealed this rejection.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemptions) erred in rejecting the application for registration under Section 12AB and approval under Section 80G without providing adequate opportunity of being heard and proper reasons, violating principles of natural justice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12AB,Section 80G,Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii),Section 80G(5)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A’’BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
PER KESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against the orders of the ld. CIT(Exemption)Bangalore both dated 28.11.2024 vide DIN & Notice No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2024- 25/1070732921(1) rejecting the registration u/s 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “The Act) and vide DIN & Notice No. ITBA/EXM/F/F/EXM45/2024-25/1070733000(1) rejecting the approval u/s 80G of the Act.
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee trust is formed as a public charitable trust vide trust deed dated 06.01.2017 with the objective of establishing schools, colleges, eradicate hunger, poverty and malnutrition, provide aid to hospitals, nursing institutions etc. An addendum to the trust deed was made on 03.02.2024 with regards to the administration of new members to the trust. Further, the assessee trust had obtained the provisional registration u/s 12AB of the Act on 4.4.2022. The assessee trust applied for the final registration u/s 12AB of the Act on 8.5.2024 i.e. within 6 months from the commencement of the activity of the trust as per section 12A (1)(ac)(iii) of the Act. During the course of proceedings before the ld. CIT(E), the assessee had provided the details like bank statement, memorandum of understanding between the trust and the landlord for the construction of building, images of the place where the construction of the said building are being carried on. However, the ld. CIT(E) observed that the activity of the trust have not yet commenced and therefore, no financials have been prepared and submitted. Further, the ld. CIT(E) is of the opinion that the assessee is required to submit necessary documents to prove the genuineness of the activity of the trust or institution and also the compliance of such requirements of any other law as are material for the purpose of achieving its objects. Since in the present case, the assessee has not submitted all the necessary details as required for registration u/s 12AB of the Act and hence the ld. CIT(E) rejected the application filed in form 10AB and cancelled the registration.
Aggrieved by the order of ld. CIT(E), the assessee has filed the present appeal before this Tribunal.
Before us, ld. A.R. of the assessee vehemently submitted that the ld. CIT(E) erred in not providing the adequate opportunity of being heard which is a gross violation of principles of natural justice. Further, the ld. CIT(E) without seeking any additional data and without issuing show cause notice rejected the application for registration which is illegal and bad in law and accordingly prayed that one more opportunity may be granted before the ld. CIT(E) to represent its case.
Ld. D.R. on the other hand relied on the order of ld. CIT(E).
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. On going through the order of ld. CIT(E), we find that as the assessee had not submitted all the necessary details as required for registration u/s 12AB of the Act, and accordingly, the ld. CIT(E) rejected the application in form 10AB dated 8.5.2024 filed for registration u/s 12AB of the Act. On going through the extract of HDFC bank as well as the note on activities as reproduced by the ld. CIT(E) in her order , it cannot be said that activity of the trust have not commenced yet. Before us, ld. A.R. of the assessee vehemently submitted that the ld. CIT(E), without seeking any additional data, without issuing the final show cause notice proposing to reject the application and without granting adequate opportunity of being heard in violation of principles of natural justice rejected the application of the assessee and accordingly prayed that one more opportunity may be granted before the ld. CIT(E) to represent its case. This being so, in the interest of justice and fair play and as requested by the ld. A.R. of the assessee, we deem it fit & proper to remit the entire issue in dispute to the file of ld. CIT(E) to decide afresh in accordance with law after giving opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The & 123/Bang/2025 ASG Trust, Bangalore Page 6 of 9 assessee is also directed to produce all the documents/records/information/financials/reports in support of its claim or as required by ld. CIT(E) for proper adjudication. It is ordered accordingly. wherein the assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:
Since we have remitted the entire issue of registration u/s 12AB of the Act to the file of ld. CIT(E), we also deem it fit & proper to remit this issue of approval u/s 80G of the Act to the file of ld. CIT(E) to decide afresh in accordance with law as the assessee has also not submitted all the necessary documents to prove the genuineness of the activities of the trust and fulfillment of all the conditions laid down in clause (i) to (v) of Section 80G of the Act.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in is also partly allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026