DHWANI SHRISTI FOUNDATION,BANGALORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS, BENGALURU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT erred in cancelling the registration and approval. It found that the assessee had commenced its activities and that the genuineness of activities, not the quantum of expenditure, is relevant for registration. The Tribunal also noted that the CIT's observations were contradictory.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, had its registration under Section 12AB and approval under Section 80G cancelled by the CIT(Exemptions). The CIT cited insufficient expenditure towards charitable objects and investment of a large portion of donations in fixed deposits as reasons for cancellation.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT was justified in cancelling the registration and approval based on the quantum of expenditure and investment of funds, and whether the genuineness of activities was sufficiently established.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Ananda Social and Educational Trust v. CIT116 citing426 ITR 340 · 2020 · SC · Read judgment
- Self Employers Institution v. CIT47 citing247 ITR 18 · 2001 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A’’BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
PER KESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
These appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against the order of ld. CIT(Exemptions), Bangalore vide DIN & Notice No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2024-25/1069931143(1) dated 24.10.2024 cancelling the registration u/s 12AB of the Act and vide DIN & Notice No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2024-25/1069948856(1) dated 25.10.2024 cancelling the approval u/s 80G of the Act.
First, we take up ITA No.2463/Bang/2024 for adjudication. In this appeal, the assessee has raised the fol
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026