AMINUL HAQUE,MORIGAON vs. CIT(A), GUWAHATI

PER BENCH:

These are appeals preferred by the assessee against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Guwahati (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] even dated 18.08.2025 for the AY
2020-21 arising from the assessment order and penalty order passed by the Assessing Officer.
2. At the outset, the learned Authorized Representative of the assessee stated that the impugned appeal was dismissed by the learned CIT
(A), when the assessee failed to furnished the bills and vouchers during the course of appellate proceedings and simply dismissing the appeal of the assessee without adjudicating the issue on the merit of the case. The ld. Counsel for the assessee prayed that an opportunity
ITA Nos. 346& 347/GTY/2025
Shri AminulHaque; AY 2020-21

may be given to present its case before the ld. AO and also to furnish the evidences i.e. bills and vouchers before the ld. AO.
3. On the other hand, the learned Departmental Representative did not object to such prayer made by the assessee before the Bench.
4. We after hearing the submission of the parties and perusing the material available on record, we find that instant/ impugned order passed by CIT (A) by simply dismissing the appeal of the assessee.
We therefore, feel it necessary and in the larger interest of justice and being fair to both the parties to restore the appeal to the file ld.
CIT
(A) for necessary re-adjudication for which reasonable opportunity to be provided to the assessee. It is further clarified that assessee should also not seek any adjournments unless otherwise required for reasonable cause.
5. In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 13.03.2026. (RAJESH KUMAR)
(DUVVURU RL REDDY)
(ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)
(VICE PRESIDENT)

Guwahati, Dated: 13.03.2026
Sudip Sarkar, Sr.PS
ITA Nos. 346& 347/GTY/2025
Shri AminulHaque; AY 2020-21

Copy of the Order forwarded to:

BY ORDER,//

Sr. Private Secretary/ Asst.