DOBERMAN SECURITY SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED ,BENGALURU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(2)(1), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that as per Section 91(2) of the DTVSV Scheme, 2024, pending appeals are deemed withdrawn upon issuance of a certificate under Section 92(1). The Tribunal accordingly dismissed the appeal as withdrawn at the assessee's request.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was delayed by 445 days. The assessee sought to opt for the Vivad Se Vishwas (VSV) Scheme, 2024, and requested the appeal be dismissed as withdrawn to pursue settlement under the scheme. The Revenue had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee to pursue settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, and the procedural requirements for such withdrawal under the scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 91(2),Section 92(1),Section 92,Section 93
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A’’ BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
PER KESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi dated 4.5.2023 vide DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1052609869(1) passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) for the assessment year 2019-20. 2. The assessee has raised 6 grounds of appeal.
At the outset, there is a delay of 445 days in filing the appeal before this Tribunal. The assessee has filed an application for condonation of delay along with an affidavit dated 16.9.2024 stating Doberman Security Solutions Private Limit
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 92(1)
- Vodafone West Limited, (Formerly Known As… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-4(1)(2), AhmedabadITA 671/AHD/2015[2010-11]Status: Disposed11 Dec 2025AY 2010-11
- The Dy CIT, Circle-4(1)(2), Ahmedabad vs Vodafone West Limited, AhmedabadITA 1634/AHD/2015[2010-11]Status: Disposed11 Dec 2025AY 2010-11
- 3M India Limited, Bangalore vs DCIT, BangaloreITA 168/BANG/2016[2011-12]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2025AY 2011-12
- Quintiles Inc., Mumbai vs DCIT (It) Cir 3(3)(1), MumbaiITA 728/MUM/2017[2013-14]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2025AY 2013-14
- Quintiles Inc., Mumbai vs DCIT (Intl. Tax) Range 3(3)(1), MumbaiITA 2104/MUM/2016[2012-13]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2025AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026