IIFL SAMASTA FINANCE LIMITED ,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-(1)(1), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that while filing Form 10DA on time is mandatory, its late filing, if the form was ready and available before the processing of the return, should not lead to the denial of the deduction. The issue of quantification of the deduction was remitted back to the AO.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a micro-finance NBFC, claimed a deduction under Section 80JJAA. The return was filed on time, but Form 10DA was uploaded on the same day as the return, which was later than the due date for filing the tax audit report.
What were the issues?
Whether the deduction under Section 80JJAA can be denied solely due to the late filing of Form 10DA, and if the quantification of the deduction needs verification by the AO.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. G.M. Knitting Industries (P.) Ltd.221 citing71 Taxmann.com 35 · 2015 · SC
- CIT v. Shivanand Electronics100 citing209 ITR 63 · 1994 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A’’BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
PER KESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. ADDL/JCIT(A)-2, Gurugram dated 27.11.2024 vide DIN & Order No. ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1070676153(1) passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”) for the assessment year 2023-24. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: IIFL Samasta Finance Limited, Bangalore IIFL Samasta Finance Limited, Bangalore 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is in the business of micro-finance, registered under Reserve Bank of India as NBFC. The assessee company fil
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80JJAA
- Vaishnavi Enterprises, Pune vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 8…ITA 3464/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Schwarz Sperren Intelligence and Security… vs Income Tax Officer, Kautilya BhavanITA 7072/MUM/2026[2020-2021]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2020-2021
- Neptune Holidays Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 8(2), KolkataITA 1958/KOL/2026[2023-2024]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2023-2024
- Neptune Holidays Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 8(2), KolkataITA 1957/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2015-2016
- 3 Generations, Delhi vs DCIT, Circle-49(1), DelhiITA 2741/DEL/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026