MR. VIKRAM DHONDU RAO, ,BANGALORE vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-4(1)(1), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the filing of Form 67 is a procedural requirement and not mandatory for claiming FTC. The denial of FTC for non-filing of Form 67 within the due date was considered an error by the lower authorities.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed foreign tax credit (FTC) for salary income earned in Indonesia. The FTC was denied by the AO during processing under Section 143(1) because Form 67 was not filed within the due date. The assessee later filed Form 67 after the intimation was passed.
What were the issues?
Whether denial of foreign tax credit for non-filing of Form 67 within the due date is valid, and if Rule 128 is a mandatory or directory provision.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Ms. Brinda Ramakrishna v. ITO109 citing135 Taxmann.com 358 · 2022 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B”BENCH: BANGALORE
Before: SHRI WASEEM AHMED & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
PER KESHAV DUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
These two appeals at the instance of the assessee are directed against the orders of the ld. ADDL/JCIT(A)-2 Visakhapatnam both dated 11.12.2024 vide DIN & Order No. ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1071108497(1) for the Assessment year 2018-19 and DIN & Order No. ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1071109313(1) for the Assessment year 2019-20 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “The Act”). Since the issue in both these appeals of the same assessee are common in nature, these are clubbed together, heard together and disposed of by this co
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 90
- Amar Rameshkumar Bhalodia, Rajkot vs The ACIT, Circle-1(1), RajkotITA 641/RJT/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Fireeye Ireland Limited, Ireland vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITITA 1431/DEL/2025[2022-2023]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-2023
- Archana Gupta, New Delhi vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3123/DEL/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Shishir Dhatwalia, Hamirpur vs Circle 1(1) Jalpaiguri, JalpaiguriITA 2583/KOL/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Raghava Gupta Valiveti, Bangalore vs Income Tax Officer Ward 5(3)(4), BangaloreITA 2744/BANG/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026