What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for assessment year 2008-09. The assessee subsequently requested to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the appeal should be withdrawn by the assessee. The assessee opted to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Bm Malhotra & Sons Ltd. vs ITO | ITAT Delhi 2021

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA

For Respondent: Shri Prakash Dubey, Sr. DR

Hearing: 15.01.2021Pronounced: 15.01.2021

PER G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax(A)-2, New Delhi dated 31.07.2019 and pertains to assessment year 2008-09..

The learned counsel for the assessee, vide letter dated 12.01.2021 received through email, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by the ITA 8082/Del/2019 assessee and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.

Learned Senior DR has no objection.

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 15th January, 2021.

BM MALHOTRA & SONS LTD.,DELHI vs. ITO, WARD- 4(1), NEW DELHI

What did the Tribunal hold?

What were the facts?

What were the issues?

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Recent GST High Court judgments