PEARS SECURITIES PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-5(2), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal directed that the assessment year be corrected to A.Y. 2012-13 and the quantum figure be corrected to Rs. 48,00,00,000/-. This corrigendum forms part of the original order.
What were the facts?
This is a corrigendum to a previous ITAT order. The original order incorrectly stated the assessment year as 2018-19 instead of 2012-13. Additionally, a quantum figure was wrongly mentioned as Rs. 48,00,000/- instead of Rs. 48,00,00,000/-.
What were the issues?
The key legal issue was the correction of factual errors in a previously passed ITAT order regarding the assessment year and a quantum figure.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Order : 15.12.2022 C O R R I G E N D U M Per Sonjoy Sarma, JM In the order passed by this Tribunal dated 05.09.2022 vide /Kol/2020, the assessment year has been wrongly mentioned as A.Y. 2018-19 on the top of the first page. It should be read as A.Y.2012-13. And also at page 1 in ground no. (ii) of the order of this Tribunal dated 05.09.2022, the quantum figure has been wrongly mentioned as Rs. 48,00,000/- instead of Rs. 48,00,00,000/-. It should be read as Rs. 48,00,00,000/-.
This corrigendum will form part of the earlier order dated 05.09.2022.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026