DEVARAJULU NATARAJAN,COIMBATORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CORP WARD 1, COIMBATORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal granted the assessee another opportunity to substantiate the source of the cash deposit before the Assessing Officer. The issue was restored back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee deposited Rs. 8.50 Lacs in cash in bank accounts during the demonetization period. The assessee claimed the source was from money given to friends and relatives over the years from salary income, but could not provide substantiation.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee has successfully substantiated the source of cash deposits made during the demonetization period.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C/SMC” BENCH, CHENNAI
आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18 arises out of the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 21.03.2022 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s. 143(3) of the Act on 30.09.2019. The grievance of the assessee is confirmation of certain addition of Rs.8.50 Lacs which 2 - represent cash deposit in Bank Accounts. Having heard rival submissions, the appeal is disposed-off as under.
The assessee admitted income of Rs.6.82 Lacs which include salary income and the case was subjected to scrutiny to verify cash deposited by assessee during demonetization period. The cash deposit during demonetized period was Rs.8.50 Lacs. The assessee stated to have sourced it from amount returned by friends and relatives out of money given to them during past several years out of salary income. However, these details could not be filed by the assessee. The salary was directly credited though banking channels. Accordingly, Ld. AO added entire cash deposit of Rs.12.85 Lacs u/s 69 which include deposit made before demonetization period also.
The Ld. CIT(A), noted that post demonetization, cash deposited in State Bank of Hyderabad was only Rs.2.50 Lacs and cash deposited in Canara bank was Rs.6 Lacs only. Accordingly, the addition was restricted to Rs.8.50 Lacs. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before us.
The Ld. AR pleaded for another opportunity before lower authorities to substantiate the source of cash deposit. The Ld. Sr. DR submitted that the assessee could not establish the source of deposit and therefore, the additions are justified. Having considered factual matrix, I am of the opinion that the onus is on assessee to substantiate the source of cash deposit of Rs.8.50 Lacs. Considering the pleadings made by Ld. AR, I deem it fit to grant another opportunity to assessee to substantiate its case before Ld. AO. Accordingly, the issue is restored back to the file of Ld. AO with a direction to assessee to substantiate the source of deposit.
The appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 15th September, 2022.
More judgments on Section 69
- Azure Knowledge Corporation Private… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2013/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ranchhodbhai Kurjibhai Kakadiya, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 553/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gorantla Rahul Kumar, Visakhapatnam vs The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 670/VIZ/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Gorantla Rahul Kumar, Visakhapatnam vs The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 669/VIZ/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026