SUYASH KUMAR AGARWAL,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-30(4), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 6496/DEL/2017Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 January 2021AY 2007-082 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as per the assessee's request and settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal for assessment year 2007-08. The assessee later requested to withdraw the appeal as they had opted to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA

For Respondent: Shri. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR
Hearing: 20.01.2021Pronounced: 20.01.2021

PER G.S. PANNU, VP : This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2007-08 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A), New Delhi dated 28.08.2017.

2.

The assessee, vide its letter dated 19.11.2020, received through email, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the 2 ITA-6496/Del/2017

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →