ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S SAGU INVESTMENT & FINANCE LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had settled the dispute under the Vivad se Vishwas Act. Consequently, the appeal was consigned to the records.
What were the facts?
The Revenue preferred an appeal against an order for Assessment Year 2012-13. The assessee opted to settle the tax arrears under The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 and filed the necessary declaration.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as the assessee has settled the dispute under the Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘G’: NEW DELHI
Appellant By Sh. Prakash Dubey, Sr. DR Respondent by Sh. Ravi P. Mall, Adv. Date of Hearing 25.01.2021 Date of Pronouncement 25.01.2021 ORDER
PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JM:
This appeal is preferred by the Revenue against order dated 30.09.2016 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-14, New Delhi {CIT(A)} for Assessment Year 2012-13.
2.0 The Ld. Authorized Representative (AR) submits that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears
ITO vs. M/s Sagu Investment & Finance Ltd. for the assessment year under consideration under The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020. It has been stated that the necessary declaration in accordance with Section 4 of The Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 has been filed by the assessee and that Form-III has also been received.
3.0 Considering the aforesaid situation, the captioned appeal is consigned to the records and treated as dismissed.
4.0 In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is consigned to the records and, for statistical purposes, is treated as dismissed.
Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 25th January, 2021.
More judgments on Section 4
- Prakash Dayaram Chandnani, Rajkot vs ITO Ward 2(1)(1), RajkotITA 927/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Ratilal Manubhai Dhanani, Amreli vs ITO WD 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 697/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Ratilal Manubhai Dhanani, Amreli vs ITO WD 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 697/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026