M/S AIR LIQUIDE GLOBAL E&C SOLUTIONS INDIA PVT. LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishwash Scheme, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeals.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against assessment orders for AY 2011-12 and 2012-13. The assessee later sought to withdraw these appeals.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw appeals due to opting for the Vivad se Vishwash Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘I-1’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JM These two appeals are filed by the assessee against the order dated 30/01/2016 passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 passed by DCIT, Circle 2(1) New Delhi and order dated 16/12/2016 passed under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 144C passed by ACIT, Circle 2(1) New Delhi, for Assessment Year 2011-12 & 2012-13 respectively.
Before us, the letter dated 27/01/2021 was filed by the Ld. AR thereby stating that the appeals may be allowed to be withdrawn as the assessee has moved an application to resolve the pending issue through Direct Tax “Vivad se Vishwash Scheme” (VSV) Act, 2020, and has filed Declaration Form No. 1 & 2 and is awaiting Form 3.
In view of the aforesaid facts and after considering the submissions of the assessee, we dismiss these appeals of assessee as withdrawn subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the aforesaid Act, the assessee shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of these four appeals and the Tribunal shall consider the same. The appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, these two appeals of the assessee are dismissed. Order pronounced in the Open Court in presence of both the parties on this 28th Day of JANUARY , 2021.
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Atiquiddin Shaikh vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Mr. Gurudev Singh vs. Kotak Mahindra BankMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026