THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, AMRITSAR. vs. M/S WAZIR SINGH ENTERPRISES, AMRITSAR.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed all grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue Department, upholding the CIT(A)'s deletions. The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's cross-objections by deleting the addition affirmed by the CIT(A) regarding car and telephone expenses.
What were the facts?
The Revenue Department appealed the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions made by the AO regarding disallowance of proportionate interest, 20% disallowance of expenses, and unverifiable travelling expenses. The assessee also filed cross-objections regarding confirmation of interest income and commission income additions, and disallowance of car and telephone expenses.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance of proportionate interest on advances and a percentage of general/travelling expenses is justified. Whether additions for un-offered interest and commission income are valid, and if disallowance of car/telephone expenses is appropriate.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: SH. N.S.SAINI & SH. N.K.CHOUDHRY
PER N.K.CHOUDHRY, JM: The Revenue Department has challenged the order dated 30.09.2016 impugned herein passed by the Ld. CIT(A)-2, Amritsar, u/s 250(6) of the I.T. Act, 1961 (hereinafter called as ‘the Act’), whereas the assessee has 2 C.O. No.20 (Asr)/2017 also filed the C.O.No.20(Asr)/2017 in challenge as well as in support of the order impugned herein.
The assessee although filed the adjournment app
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 36(i)(iii)
- Surendra Singh Bengani, Kolkata vs A.C.I.T., CC - 4(1), KolkataITSSA 35/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2014-2015
- Surendra Singh Bengani, Kolkata vs A.C.I.T., CC - 4(1), KolkataITSSA 34/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2013-2014
- Surendra Singh Bengani, Kolkata vs A.C.I.T., CC - 4(1), KolkataITSSA 33/KOL/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2012-2013
- Surendra Singh Bengani, Kolkata vs A.C.I.T., CC - 4(1), KolkataITSSA 32/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2011-2012
- Surendra Singh Bengani, Kolkata vs A.C.I.T., CC - 4(1), KolkataITSSA 31/KOL/2026[2010-2011]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2010-2011
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026