DIOCESE OF CHANDIGARH,CNI,MISSION COMPUNDBROWN ROAD,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS), JALANDHAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to provide sufficient evidence to support its claim regarding the group gratuity fund balance. The difference between the closing balance and the brought-forward amount also required further inquiry.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, claimed exemption under sections 11 & 12. The AO added Rs. 20,39,842/- and Rs. 1,76,503/- as part of gross receipts, considering them as income of the trust. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's order.
What were the issues?
Whether the amount shown as group gratuity fund balance and interest accrued thereon should be treated as part of the trust's gross receipts and income for the year.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: Sh. N. S. Saini & Sh. N. K. Choudhry
Per N. S. Saini, Accountant Member:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A)-4, Ludhiana dated 22.09.2017. 2. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: “The learned CIT (APPEALS) order is not justified so far as additions resulting in taxable income of the assessee amounting to Rs. 1823453/- by non- deletion of following additions made by Assessing Officer in order u/s 143(3) in gross receipts of the assessee and even afterwards net rectifying the order passed u/s 154 r.w.s. 250(6) as per details below:
The amount of Group Gratuity Fund balance as on 31.03.2012 Rs.2039842/- and interest accrued on this Group Gratuity Fund Rs.176503/- for the financial year has
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026