SH. VIJAY KUMAR AGGARWAL, PROP.,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, JALANDHAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the payability of interest depends on the loan agreement terms, not the bank's accounting entries. Since the assessee failed to provide evidence of deferred payability, the disallowance under Section 43B(e) was upheld.
What were the facts?
The assessee debited accrued bank interest on loans classified as NPA to its profit and loss account. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) disallowed this deduction, invoking Section 43B(e) of the Income Tax Act, as the interest was not actually paid.
What were the issues?
Whether accrued but unpaid interest on NPA accounts is disallowable under Section 43B(e) when the bank has not debited it as receivable and the assessee claims it as a business expense.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 43B(e)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(13)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd.2,664 citing88 ITR 192 · 1973 · SC
- Bharat Earth Movers v. CIT901 citing245 ITR 428 · 2000 · SC · Read judgment
- Rotork Controls India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT739 citing314 ITR 62 · 2009 · SC
- Taparia Tools Ltd. v. JCIT343 citing372 ITR 605 · 2015 · SC · Read judgment
- Calcutta Co. Ltd. v. CIT341 citing37 ITR 1 · 1959 · SC · Read judgment
- Bajaj Tempo Ltd. v. CIT289 citing196 ITR 188 · 1992 · SC
- Metal Box Co. of India Ltd. v. Their Workmen276 citing73 ITR 53 · 1969 · SC
- 7.14 In CIT v. Gwalior Rayon Silk Mfg. Co. Ltd.120 citing196 ITR 149 · 1992 · SC
- CIT v. National Duncan Ltd.14 citing260 ITR 97 · 2003 · HC
- CIT v. Hindustan Construction Company Ltd.8 citing374 ITR 101 · 2015 · HC
- CIT v. OM Metals and Minerals P Ltd.7 citing373 ITR 406 · 2015 · HC
- Madras in CIT v. K.E. Sundara Mudaliar5 citing18 ITR 259 · 1950 · HC
- Vinir Engineering P Ltd. v. DCIT3 citing313 ITR 154 · 2009 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR
Before: Sh. N. S. Saini & Sh. N. K. Choudhry
Per N. S. Saini, Accountant Member:
These are the appeals filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A)-1, Jalandhar dated 28.10.2016 for the assessment year 2013-14, dated 29.11.2016 for the assessment year 2012-13 and dated 14.12.2017 for the assessment year 2014-15. 2. At the time of hearing, the ld. AR of the assessee submitted that the facts and issue involved in all these appeal is common and therefore, he will be arguing for appeal for assessment year 2013-14 and the same arguments should be ITA Nos.38 & 77/Asr./2017 2 ITA No. 119/Asr./2018 Vijay
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026