ARYA SAMAJ TRUST,KAPURTHALA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CPC, BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that while Section 11 and 12 might not apply due to lack of registration, the entire receipts could not be taxed summarily. Expenses incurred for the trust's objects should be considered, and any disallowance would require scrutiny assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust filed a return declaring nil income. The CPC processed the return under Section 143(1) and taxed the entire receipts without allowing claimed expenses. The CIT(A) upheld this action.
What were the issues?
Whether the entire receipts of a trust can be taxed under Section 143(1) without considering its expenses, even without Section 12AA registration. Whether disallowance of expenses without scrutiny assessment is valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(1),Section 11,Section 12,Section 12AA,Section 143(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Camp Bench at Jalandhar
Before: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Ravish Sood
PER RAVISH SOOD, JM The present appeal filed by the assessee trust for A.Y. 2015-16 is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-2, Jalandhar, dated 29.04.2017, which in turn arises from the intimation under Sec. 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘IT Act’), dated 27.03.2017. The assessee assailing the order of the CIT(A) has raised before us the following grounds of appeal:
“1. That the CIT(A) was not justified in confirming the order passed by AO u/s 143(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961. P a g e | 2 ITA No. 443/Asr./2018 A.Y. 2015-16
That the CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the appellant h
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026