DMC AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED,TIRUVALLUR vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, CORPORATE WARD, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT,NUNGAMBAKKAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the disallowance of employees' contribution to PF/ESI is to be confirmed for normal computation of income, following the Supreme Court decision in Checkmate Services P. Ltd. However, for book profit computation under Section 115JB, such disallowance would not be added as it is not an adjustment envisaged in the relevant explanation.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deductions for employees' contribution to PF/ESI. The Assessing Officer disallowed these contributions under Section 43B read with Section 36(1)(va). The CIT(A) confirmed this disallowance.
What were the issues?
Whether employees' contribution to PF/ESI disallowed for late payment should be added back for normal income computation and book profit computation under Section 115JB.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 43B,Section 36(1)(va),Section 2(24)(x),Section 115JB
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
माननीय *ी वी. दुगा0 राव, �ाियक सद2 एवं माननीय *ी मनोज कुमार अ7वाल ,लेखा सद2 के सम9। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपील सं./ (िनधा0रण वष0 / Assessment Year: 2017-18) M/s. DMC Automotive Private Ltd. The Assessing Officer बनाम/ No.5, Othappai Village, Uthukottai Taluk Corporate Ward-1(4) Vs. Odappai B.O, Poondi, Tiruvallur-602 023. Chennai. �थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AACCD-4671-P (अपीलाथ /Appellant) : (#$थ / Respondent) अपीलाथ कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri Govindarajan (CA) – Ld. AR #$थ कीओरसे/Respondent by : Shri ARV Sreenivasan – (Addl. CIT) – Ld. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/ : 26-10-2022 Date of Hearing घोषणाकीतारीख / : 02-11-2022 Date of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member):
In this appeal for Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18, the sole grievance of the assessee is confirmation of disallowance of Employees’ Contribution to PF / ESI in terms of Sec.43B r.w.s. 36(1)(va) as well as Sec. 2(24)(x). This issue was hitherto being decided by us in assessee’s favor, inter-alia, by relying upon the decision of Hon’ble High Court of Madras in CIT v. Industrial Security & Intelligence India (P.) Ltd. (TCA No. 585 of 2015, dated 24-7-2015). However, now this issue has been decided by Hon’ble Supreme Court in favor of revenue in its recent decision in bunch of appeals titled as Checkmate Services P. Ltd. Vs CIT (Civil Appeal No.2833 of 2016 dated 12.10.2022). It is admitted position that this decision applies to the facts of case before us. In the above background, the appeal is disposed-off as under. The registry has noted a delay of 1 day in the appeal which stand condoned.
The assessee’s return was scrutinized u/s 143(3) on 20.12.2019. The Ld. AO made disallowance u/s 36(1)(va) for Rs.14.39 Lacs and reduced the loss declared by the assessee. The said adjustment was made while computing Book Profits u/s 115JB also. The Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance. Regarding 115JB, Ld. CIT(A) observed that no such disallowance has been made by Ld. AO. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before us. 3. So far as the reduction of loss in normal provisions is concerned, respectfully following the binding decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court as cited above, the stand of Ld. CIT(A) stand confirmed. The corresponding grounds stands dismissed. 4. The Ld. AR submitted that such a disallowance should not be added while computing Book Profits u/s 115JB. We find that as per provisions of Sec.2(24)(x), the contribution so received by assessee from its employees would become its income and the deduction would be allowed to the assessee if dues are deposited as per the mandate of Sec.36(1)(va). However, Book Profits u/s 115JB means profits as shown in the statement of Profit & Loss Account. The Book Profits are to be further adjusted to the extent as provided in Explanation-1 to Sec.115JB(2). Such an adjustment of employee’s contribution has not been envisaged therein. Further, upon receipt of contribution, the assessee becomes liable to deposit the same and it is reflected as ‘current liabilities’ for the assessee. The same is added to the income of the assessee in the computation of income and if the assessee deposit the same as per the mandate of Sec.36(1)(va), the deduction of the same is allowed to the assessee. Thus, this amount is not credited to Profit & Loss Account but the adjustment of the same is made in the computation of income. Therefore, this disallowance, in our opinion, would not form part of Book Profits u/s 115JB. We order so. The Ld. AO is directed to verify the same and compute correct Book Profits u/s 115JB. The corresponding grounds stands allowed for statistical purposes.
The appeal stands partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 02nd November, 2022.
More judgments on Section 43B
- Vco Consulatatns and Sevices Private… vs ITO, Corporate Ward 3(3), ChennaiITA 2145/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power Private… vs The Dy CIT Circle 8(2)(1), MumbaiITA 8020/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Amritvarsha Industries Limited, Ambedkar… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6481/DEL/2026[2010-2011]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2010-2011
- Karaj Singh, Haryana vs PCIT (Central) Gurgaon, GurgaonITA 642/CHANDI/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT, Mumbai vs Imp Powers Limited, MumbaiITA 4982/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026