ISHA JINDAL,GHAZIABAD vs. ITO WARD - 42(2), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's request for withdrawal and decided to consign the appeal to records, treating it as dismissed. This dismissal is subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee requested withdrawal of their appeal before the ITAT. This was due to opting to settle tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020'.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw an appeal due to opting for a settlement scheme. The Tribunal had to decide how to dispose of the pending appeal in light of this development.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘ C’ NEW DLEHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE- & SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY
PER G.S. PANNU, V.P. This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2010-11 is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-43, New Delhi dated 09.01.2020.
The assessee, vide its letter dated 27.01.2021, received through Email, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the ”Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”.
Considering the aforesaid situation, the captioned appeal is consigned to records and treated as dismissed.
However, the aforesaid is subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the Act, the assessee shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law. The Revenue has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat.
In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is consigned to record and, for statistical purposes, is treated as dismissed.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026