MAHARISHI RAMAN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 1(4), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 641/DEL/2020Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 February 2021AY 2016-172 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal for assessment year 2016-17. Subsequently, the assessee requested withdrawal of the appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be withdrawn by the assessee due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 5(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘ C’ NEW DLEHI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE- & SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY

Hearing: 10/02/2021

PER G.S. PANNU, V.P. This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2016-17 is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-40, New Delhi dated 28.11.2019.

2.

The learned counsel for the assessee, vide its letter dated 22.01.2021, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.

3.

Learned Senior DR has no objection.

4.

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

More judgments on Section 5(1)

All 1,811 judgments and leading authorities on Section 5(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →