YANMAR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. DCIT CPC, BANGALORE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's request for withdrawal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed, subject to the condition that it could be reinstituted if the dispute was not resolved under the scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Yanmar India Private Limited, filed an appeal for assessment year 2018-19. The assessee subsequently requested withdrawal of the appeal as they opted to settle the tax dispute under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020'.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw an appeal due to opting for a tax settlement scheme. The Tribunal had to decide on the appropriate course of action for the pending appeal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘ C’ NEW DLEHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE- & SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY
PER G.S. PANNU, V.P. This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2018-19 is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)- 9, New Delhi dated 17.08.2020.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of virtual hearing before us. The assessee, vide its letter dated 03.02.2021, received through Email, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the ”Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”.
Considering the aforesaid situation, the captioned appeal is consigned to records and treated as dismissed.
However, the aforesaid is subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the Act, the assessee shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law. The Revenue has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat.
In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is consigned to record and, for statistical purposes, is treated as dismissed.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026