SAJAL JAIN HUF KARTA,MORADABAD vs. ITO WARD-2(2), MORADABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 6923/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 February 2021AY 2015-162 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn based on the settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

What were the facts?

The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal filed for assessment year 2015-16. The reason for withdrawal was the assessee's decision to settle the tax dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The primary issue was the procedural aspect of withdrawing an appeal under specific settlement provisions.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘ C’ NEW DLEHI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE- & SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY

Hearing: 10/02/2021

PER G.S. PANNU, V.P. This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2015-16 is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-Moradabad dated 10.06.2019.

2.

The learned counsel for the assessee, vide its letter dated 29.01.2021, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.

3.

Learned Senior DR has no objection.

4.

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →