CHATTAR SINGH,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-62(1), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted that the assessee sought to withdraw the appeal because the issues were settled under the Vivad Vishwas Scheme. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2012-2013. The assessee subsequently filed a letter seeking withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee's appeal could be withdrawn due to settlement under the Vivad Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “SMC-1” : DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI O.P. KANT
ORDER PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M. This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-36, New Delhi, Dated 22.07.2019, for the A.Y. 2012-2013.
In this appeal, Assessee filed an application seeking permission to withdraw the appeal as the issues involved in the appeal are settled under VIVAD SE
2 ITA.No.8057/Del./2019 Shri Chattar Singh, New Delhi. VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020 and Form No.3 have already been issued by the Department.
In view of the above, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the Assessee dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open Court.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026