MCKINSEY KNOWLEDGE CENTRE INDIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 16(2), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn by the assessee. The dismissal was with liberty to restore the appeal if the dispute settlement under the scheme was not finalized.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Assessing Officer. The assessee later sought to withdraw the appeal. This was because the assessee had opted to settle the tax dispute under the "Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020".
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The primary issue was the procedural consequence of the assessee's decision to settle the dispute under the scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘I-1’ : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI KULDIP SINGH & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
Date of Hearing : 16.02.2021 Date of Order : 16.02.2021 O R D E R PER KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER : Appellant, McKinsey Knowledge Centre India Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as ‘the assessee’), by filing the present appeal, sought to set aside the impugned order dated 19.07.2017 passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 143 (3) r/w section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) qua the assessment year 2013-14.
Ld. Counsel for the assessee filed an application seeking withdrawal of the appeal on the ground that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020” and has filed necessary Forms 1 & 2 with the Tax Department, which was accepted and processed vide Form 3 issued by the Tax Department.
Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, present appeal is hereby dismissed with liberty to get it restored by the assessee in case dispute is not settled as per scheme. The Revenue has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat. Consequently, the present appeal is dismissed. Order pronounced in open court on this 16th day of February, 2021 after the conclusion of the virtual hearing.
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Om.S.R. Construction, Through Its Proprietor Mr. Kuldeep Sharma vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Its Commissioner, Commerical Tax DepartmentJharkhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026