MUKESH NARULA,DELHI vs. ITO WARD-34(3), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 4154/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 February 2021AY 2010-112 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee requested withdrawal of the appeal for AY 2010-11, stating they opted to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate under Section 5(1) of the Act was filed.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 5(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “F” BENCH: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI R.K.PANDA & SHRI K.N.CHARY

Hearing: 19.02.2021Pronounced: 19.02.2021

This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2010-11 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-12, New Delhi dated 10.08.2018.

2.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of Virtual hearing before us. The learned counsel for the assessee, vide its letter dated 11.02.2021, received through email, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.

3.

Learned Senior DR has no objection.

4.

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 19th February, 2021.

More judgments on Section 5(1)

All 1,811 judgments and leading authorities on Section 5(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →