DCIT - CC - 3(2), MUMBAI vs. TEXPERT TEXTILES PVT. LTD., MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that a protective addition made in the hands of the assessee is not sustainable if the substantive addition is also not sustainable. Therefore, the addition on account of commission was also not sustainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue had made protective additions under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act in the hands of the assessee. The substantive addition made in the hands of other entities was accepted by them.
What were the issues?
Whether a protective addition is sustainable when the substantive addition is not sustainable, and whether additions on account of commission are valid in such circumstances.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
M/s. Solitaire Texfab & Traders Textiles P. Ltd. and M/s. First Winner Industries Pvt. Ltd. protective addition under section 69C of the Act qua the same amount in the hands of the assessee is not sustainable. Similarly, when protective addition made in the hands of assessee is not sustainable addition on account of commission to the tune of Rs.17,75,000/- is also not sustainable.
During the course of argument the Ld. D.R. for the Revenue stated at bar that the substantive addition made in this case has also been confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) and thereafter the same has been accepted by M/s. Bhagwat Textiles Pvt. Ltd. and others in whose hands the substantive addition was made.
In view of what has been discussed above, we are of the considered view that finding no illegality or perversity in the impugned order passed by the Ld. CIT(A) present appeal filed by the Revenue is hereby dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 18.03.2022.
More judgments on Section 69C
- Jitendrakumar Bhikhabhai Shrimali, Mehsana vs ITO Ward 1, MehsaanaITA 1290/AHD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sonu Jain, Agra vs ITO WD(1)(1)(2), AgraITA 671/AGR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mritunjay Singh, Kudra vs AO, SasaramITA 454/PAT/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2017-2018
- Shantilal Mafaji Kachchhava, Banaskantha vs ITO WD 1 Palanpur, PalanpurITA 2256/AHD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Madhusudhan Gade, Nizamabad vs ITO., Ward-1, NizamabadITA 379/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026