ANAND PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 28(1), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 7024/DEL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 February 2021AY 2014-152 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal acknowledged the assessee's request for withdrawal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The appeal was consigned to records and treated as dismissed, subject to the condition that it could be reinstituted if the dispute resolution under the scheme failed.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal for assessment year 2014-15. During the hearing, the assessee requested withdrawal of the appeal, stating they had opted to settle the dispute under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020'.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for a dispute resolution scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘ C’ NEW DLEHI

Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA & SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY

Hearing: 25/02/2021

PER R.K PANDA, AM:

1.

This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2014-15 is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-10, New Delhi dated 21.08.2018.

2.

None has appeared on behalf of assessee at the time of virtual hearing before us. The assessee, however, vide its letter dated 13.02.2021, received through e-mail, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the ”Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”.

3.

Considering the aforesaid situation, the captioned appeal is consigned to records and treated as dismissed.

4.

However, the aforesaid is subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the Act, the assessee shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law. The Revenue has no objection with regard to the aforesaid caveat.

5.

In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is consigned to record and, for statistical purposes, is treated as dismissed.

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →