VINAY KUMAR JAIN,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD- 67(3), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5969/DEL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 February 2021AY 2012-132 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as per the assessee's request.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal for assessment year 2012-13. The assessee subsequently requested withdrawal of the appeal, having opted to settle the tax arrears under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee's appeal should be withdrawn and dismissed due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 5(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘C’: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA & SHRI K.N. CHARY

For Respondent: Shri. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR
Hearing: 25.02.2021Pronounced: 25.02.2021

PER R.K. PANDA, AM:

1.

This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2012-13 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A), New Delhi dated 28.06.2018.

2.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of Virtual Hearing before us. The assessee, vide its letter dated 16.02.2021, received through email, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that 2 ITA-5969/Del/2018

More judgments on Section 5(1)

All 1,811 judgments and leading authorities on Section 5(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →