RAM PRASAD SINGH,BIJNOR vs. ITO, WARD- 2, BIJNOR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5905/DEL/2017Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 March 2021AY 2011-123 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal for assessment year 2011-12. The assessee subsequently requested withdrawal of the appeal as they opted to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee's appeal should be withdrawn due to opting for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “D” BENCH: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & SHRI K.NARSIMHA CHARY

Hearing: 17.03.2021Pronounced: 17.03.2021

PER G.S. PANNU, VP : This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2011-12 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A), Moradabad dated 27.06.2017.

2.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of Virtual hearing before us. The learned counsel for the assessee, vide its letter received through email, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.

3.

Learned Senior DR has no objection.

4.

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 17th March, 2021.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →