RUCHIKA BHASIN,DELHI vs. ITO, WARD- 70(2), DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5192/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 March 2021AY 2014-153 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted the assessee's application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to approach the Tribunal if the dispute could not be settled for technical reasons.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2014-15. The assessee subsequently moved an application under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 to settle the dispute.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the settlement of the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, leading to the withdrawal of the appeal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘SMC-2’, NEW DELHI

Before: SH. N. K. BILLAIYA & MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE

Hearing: 03/03/2021Pronounced: 03/03/2021

This appeal filed by the assessee is preferred against the order of the CIT(A)-21, New Delhi dated 15.04.2019 for A.Y. 2014-15. 2. Vide letter dated 04.03.2021 the assessee brought to our notice that the he has moved an application under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 to settle the dispute.

3.

Noting the fact this appeal by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. However, a liberty is given to the assessee to approach the Tribunal, if for some technical reason the dispute could not be settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

4.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Decision announced in the open court in the presence of both the representatives on 03.03.2021.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →